Presentation FERMI _HBL presentation.pdf
G.Chiaro, M.Meyer, M. Di Mauro, D.Salvetti, G. La Mura, D.J. Thompson
P R E L I M I N A RY
Blazars and in particular the subclass of high synchrotron peaked objects are the main targets for the present generation of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs)and will remain of great importance for very high-energy gamma-ray science in light of the future Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA).
The observation time of high energy sources by IACTs is limited by their small field of view, by the presence of many competing source populations to observe and science cases to study. Therefore, it is important to select the most promising targets in order to save observation time and consequently to increase the number of detections.
The aim of this study is to search for unclassified blazars , using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm that can realistically observed with IACTs or CTA in 50 or 5 hours.
The 3FGL catalogue contains two classes of source with uncertain classification that offer opportunities to identify HBLs and subsequently TeV candidates according with the TeV catalog census : (i) the 573 BCU and (ii) 1010 UCSs. Recently in https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00385 the authors applied a number of machine-learning techniques to classify 3FGL UCSs as pulsars or AGN. The authors found 334 pulsars, 559 sources of AGN type and 117 remained uncertain.
The resulting 573 BCU and 559 AGN type sources represent the first targets for this search and we apply an optimized version of the ANN described in https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05727 in order to compute the likelihood distribution of HBL and non-HBL sources
We perform an analysis of Fermi-LAT data in order to find the gamma-ray SED of our HBL candidates and confirm the nature of them.
We analyze 104 months of Pass 8 data, from 2008 August 4 to 2017 April 4, selecting gamma-ray events in the energy range E=[0.1,1000] GeV, passing standard data quality selection criteria.
We also compare the extrapolated fluxes of the candidates against the sensitivity of present IACTs and the future CTA. We use the Fermi-LAT spectral shape of the sources obtained in the range between 0.1 and 300 GeV using the best-fit model parameters from the LAT 4-year 3FGL Catalogue and particularly we referred to the following relation derived from the spectral model that fits the data.
The study is in progress and paper wil come soon.
ref.contact Graziano Chiaro graziano.chiaro@inaf.it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data
3FGL blazar subclasses HBL and non-HBL distribution against gamma-ray flux
Likelihood distribution of HBL and non-HBL sources in 3FGL blazars by our applied ANN algorithm.
This result could show that the applied algorithm is not able to clearly identify HBLs but the likelihood distribution can still be acceptable for the aim of this study
Distribution of the ANN likelihood to be HBL candidates of 3FGL BCUs. (right) and UCS_bcu (left). Vertical blue and steel blue lines indicate the applied classification thresholds to identify sources as High Confidence candidates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full list of BCU HBL candidates. In Cols. 9, 10, 11 the observabilty at the IACT sites. On the top of the list the candidates with the highest Likelihood (L> 0.89) .
3FGL name | Association | TS | Sp.Index | TS_var | L_hbl | RAJ2000 | DecJ2000 | HESS | VERITAS | MAGIC |
3FGL J0047.9+5447 | 1RXS J004754.5+544758 | 56.73 | 1.57 | 11.7 | 0.92 | 12.0160498 | 4.80784405 | X | X | |
X 3FGL J1155.4-3417 | NVSS J115520-341718 | 147.32 | 147.32 | 16.24 | 0.92 | 178.8740215 | -34.32645279 | X | ||
3FGL J1434.6+6640 | 1RXS J143442.0+664031 | 73.9 | 1.58 | 16.78 | 0.92 | 218.7228694 | 66.67084133 | X | X | |
3FGL J0921.0-2258 | NVSS J092057-225721 | 62.51 | 62.51 | 10.5 | 0.91 | 140.2437951 | -22.94845947 | X | X | X |
3FGL J0648.1+1606 | 1RXS J064814.1+160708 | 40.1 | 1.81 | 13.91 | 0.90 | 102.0277929 | 16.08911409 | X | X | X |
3FGL J1711.6+8846 | 1RXS J171643.8+884414 | 44.3 | 1.83 | 12.4 | 0.90 | 258.6700448 | 88.75072331 | X | X | |
3FGL J1714.1-2029 | 1RXS J171405.2-202747 | 73.8 | 1.44 | 18.16 | 0.90 | 258.5155102 | -20.47598092 | X | X | X |
3FGL J1910.8+2855 | 1RXS J191053.2+285622 | 102.25 | 1.61 | 15.16 | 0.90 | 287.7132899 | 28.9403263 | X | X | X |
3FGL J0153.4+7114 | TXS 0149+710 | 80.86 | 1.81 | 19.72 | 0.89 | 28.42864335 | 71.25516089 | X | X | |
3FGL J0506.9-5435 | 1ES 0505-546 | 455.43 | 1.49 | 29.82 | 0.89 | 76.75704931 | -54.59583993 | X | X | |
3FGL J1944.1-4523 | 1RXS J194422.6-452326 | 100.69 | 1.63 | 11.11 | 0.89 | 296.1113217 | 45.38296215 | X | ||
3FGL J0742.4-8133c | SUMSS J074220-813139 | 32.29 | 2.03 | 11.8 | 0.92 | 115.4463652 | -81.53829083 | |||
3FGL J0040.3+4049 | B3 0037+405 | 75.94 | 1.93 | 12.02 | 0.9 | 10.08708372 | 40.83205536 | |||
3FGL J0043.7-1117 | 1RXS J004349.3-111612 | 69.4 | 1.91 | 12.51 | 0.88 | 10.93797337 | -11.31276512 | |||
3FGL J1824.4+4310 | 1RXS J182418.7+430954 | 80.91 | 1.82 | 19.74 | 0.88 | 276.1228226 | 43.17807155 | |||
3FGL J0528.3+1815 | 1RXS J052829.6+181657 | 35.69 | 1.67 | 14.66 | 0.87 | 82.11289303 | 18.27306451 | |||
3FGL J0646.4-5452 | PMN J0646-5451 | 190.34 | 1.46 | 17.37 | 0.87 | 101.6181351 | -54.91863251 | |||
3FGL J1959.8-4725 | SUMSS J195945-472519 | 923.79 | 1.51 | 94.31 | 0.87 | 299.9397253 | -47.42901042 | |||
3FGL J2108.6-8619 | 1RXS J210959.5-861853 | 91.04 | 1.65 | 10.72 | 0.87 | 316.9856579 | -86.30865936 | |||
3FGL J0039.0-2218 | PMN J0039-2220 | 89.34 | 1.66 | 11.61 | 0.86 | 9.766909807 | -22.31500028 | |||
3FGL J0305.2-1607 | PKS 0302-16 | 147.6 | 1.6 | 22.94 | 0.86 | 46.29075836 | -16.14465396 | |||
3FGL J1040.8+1342 | 1RXS J104057.7+134216 | 69.15 | 1.7 | 11.06 | 0.86 | 160.2594773 | 13.71799931 | |||
3FGL J2312.9-6923 | SUMSS J231347-692332 | 35.32 | 1.72 | 16.13 | 0.86 | 348.4026935 | -69.39020448 | |||
3FGL J0515.5-0123 | NVSS J051536-012427 | 45.65 | 1.79 | 11.76 | 0.85 | 78.87455087 | -1.419462214 | |||
3FGL J0620.4+2644 | RX J0620.6+2644 | 92.02 | 1.53 | 15.1 | 0.85 | 95.17349572 | 26.74390304 | |||
3FGL J0640.0-1252 | TXS 0637-128 | 174.15 | 1.52 | 14.44 | 0.85 | 100.0137646 | -12.90013415 | |||
3FGL J0733.5+5153 | NVSS J073326+515355 | 104.32 | 1.68 | 11.18 | 0.85 | 113.3491751 | 51.86215575 | |||
3FGL J1141.2+6805 | 1RXS J114118.3+680433 | 140.09 | 1.68 | 23.32 | 0.85 | 175.3295357 | 68.0822362 | |||
3FGL J1203.5-3925 | PMN J1203-3926 | 103.2 | 1.69 | 18.55 | 0.85 | 180.8463393 | -39.42493679 | |||
3FGL J1939.6-4925 | SUMSS J193946-492539 | 64.55 | 1.84 | 15.92 | 0.85 | 294.9560989 | -49.46611442 | |||
3FGL J2316.8-5209 | SUMSS J231701-521003 | 37.3 | 1.78 | 15.19 | 0.85 | 349.2774178 | -52.18819115 | |||
3FGL J0132.5-0802 | PKS 0130-083 | 71.92 | 1.87 | 12.42 | 0.84 | 23.18651181 | -8.065356912 | |||
3FGL J0342.6-3006 | PKS 0340-302 | 43.17 | 1.96 | 13.37 | 0.84 | 55.71024104 | -30.11480314 | |||
3FGL J1446.8-1831 | NVSS J144644-182922 | 27.9 | 1.7 | 8.69 | 0.84 | 221.7533056 | -18.51448366 | |||
3FGL J1855.1-6008 | PMN J1854-6009 | 21.39 | 1.83 | 6.74 | 0.84 | 283.672544 | -60.1250475 | |||
3FGL J0043.5-0444 | 1RXS J004333.7-044257 | 75.94 | 1.91 | 11.93 | 0.83 | 10.8838869 | -4.721385702 | |||
3FGL J0746.9+8511 | NVSS J074715+851208 | 118.95 | 1.67 | 18.34 | 0.83 | 117.2491059 | 85.21791595 | |||
3FGL J0650.5+2055 | 1RXS J065033.9+205603 | 206.21 | 1.72 | 20.06 | 0.82 | 102.6389899 | 20.92952844 | |||
3FGL J1319.6+7759 | NVSS J131921+775823 | 182.64 | 1.95 | 25.12 | 0.82 | 199.9478129 | 78.00731101 | |||
3FGL J1908.8-0130 | NVSS J190836-012642 | 306.43 | 2.1 | 35.5 | 0.82 | 287.2015241 | -1.527053471 | |||
3FGL J2347.9+5436 | NVSS J234753+543627 | 163.04 | 1.78 | 21.76 | 0.82 | 356.9713227 | 54.58170077 | |||
3FGL J0204.2+2420 | B2 0201+24 | 27.62 | 1.7 | 12.29 | 0.81 | 31.09102234 | 24.27132207 | |||
3FGL J0439.6-3159 | 1RXS J043931.4-320045 | 119.86 | 1.74 | 24.96 | 0.81 | 69.85155048 | -32.03484089 | |||
3FGL J1547.1-2801 | 1RXS J154711.8-280222 | 96.77 | 1.77 | 16.75 | 0.81 | 236.8077415 | -28.04443418 | |||
3FGL J1612.4-3100 | NVSS J161219-305937 | 494.96 | 1.86 | 116.18 | 0.81 | 243.1006458 | -30.99149787 | |||
3FGL J0030.2-1646 | 1RXS J003019.6-164723 | 168.7 | 1.66 | 30.18 | 0.8 | 7.586848013 | -16.82218924 | |||
3FGL J1158.9+0818 | RX J1158.8+0819 | 51.45 | 1.81 | 11.81 | 0.8 | 179.7088941 | 8.311328097 | |||
3FGL J1841.2+2910 | MG3 J184126+2910 | 195.91 | 1.79 | 22.89 | 0.8 | 280.3558247 | 29.15522239 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full list of BCU HBL candidates. In Cols. 8, 9, 10 the observabilty at the IACT sites. On the top of the list the candidates with the highest Likelihood (L> 0.89)
3FGL name | TS | Sp.Index | TS_var | L_hbl | RAJ2000 | DecJ2000 | HESS | VERITAS | MAGIC |
3FGL J2142.6-2029 | 36.07 | 1.68 | 8.19 | 0.914 | 325.6572 | -20.4955 | X | X | X |
3FGL J2321.6-1619 | 34.14 | 1.73 | 45.13 | 0.911 | 350.3966 | -16.3171 | X | X | X |
3FGL J2145.5+1007 | 52.53 | 1.70 | 19.90 | 0.906 | 326.3815 | 10.1296 | X | X | X |
$3FGL J2300.0+4053 | 174.53 | 1.64 | 6.97 | 0.904 | 345.0583 | 40.8750 | X | X | X |
3FGL J2224.4+0351 | 29.5 | 1.93 | 9.55 | 0.89 | 336.1020 | 3.8590 | |||
3FGL J1525.8-0834 | 59.52 | 1.92 | 23.26 | 0.89 | 231.4700 | -8.5790 | |||
3FGL J1619.1+7538 | 107.12 | 1.86 | 14.91 | 0.88 | 244.9610 | 75.6730 | |||
3FGL J0251.1-1829 | 104.26 | 1.58 | 10.20 | 0.88 | 42.7970 | -18.4860 | |||
3FGL J0020.9+0323 | 60.66 | 2.09 | 22.50 | 0.88 | 5.2310 | 3.3950 | |||
3FGL J0813.5-0356 | 57.02 | 1.71 | 13.15 | 0.88 | 123.3870 | -3.9390 | |||
3FGL J1234.7-0437 | 51.54 | 2.00 | 29.76 | 0.87 | 188.6970 | -4.6220 | |||
3FGL J1922.2+2313 | 80.83 | 2.22 | 22.63 | 0.87 | 290.5650 | 23.2260 | |||
3FGL J2043.6+0001 | 48.48 | 2.01 | 24.43 | 0.87 | 310.9010 | 0.0290 | |||
3FGL J0312.7-2222 | 177.14 | 1.84 | 18.27 | 0.87 | 48.1760 | -22.3710 | |||
3FGL J1513.3-3719 | 54.74 | 1.91 | 18.06 | 0.87 | 228.3290 | -37.3190 | |||
3FGL J0524.5-6937 | 94.15 | 2.05 | 18.37 | 0.86 | 81.1280 | -69.6290 | |||
3FGL J1225.4-3448 | 22.27 | 1.74 | 7.01 | 0.86 | 186.3560 | -34.8070 | |||
3FGL J1222.7+7952 | 43.83 | 2.12 | 14.79 | 0.86 | 185.9965 | 79.8921 | |||
3FGL J2309.0+5428 | 77.06 | 1.75 | 17.68 | 0.85 | 347.2520 | 54.4760 | |||
3FGL J2015.3-1431 | 17.42 | 1.81 | 14.63 | 0.85 | 303.8543 | -14.5344 | |||
3FGL J2053.9+2922 | 359.63 | 1.76 | 43.97 | 0.85 | 313.4760 | 29.3740 | |||
3FGL J0234.2-0629 | 90.7 | 2.00 | 20.73 | 0.84 | 38.5640 | -6.1050 | |||
3FGL J1545.0-6641 | 150.1 | 1.59 | 11.85 | 0.84 | 236.2650 | -66.6997 | |||
3FGL J0731.8-3010 | 37.07 | 1.96 | 12.91 | 0.84 | 112.9740 | -30.1770 | |||
3FGL J0952.8+0711 | 50.96 | 1.91 | 14.12 | 0.84 | 148.2170 | 7.1990 | |||
3FGL J0527.3+6647 | 51.89 | 1.90 | 14.78 | 0.83 | 81.9000 | 66.7767 | |||
3FGL J1528.1-2904 | 26.28 | 1.80 | 11.72 | 0.83 | 232.0360 | -29.0680 | |||
3FGL J0049.0+4224 | 36.95 | 1.80 | 16.58 | 0.82 | 12.2530 | 42.4130 | |||
3FGL J1057.6-4051 | 40.23 | 1.71 | 15.54 | 0.82 | 164.4090 | -40.8620 | |||
3FGL J0928.3-5255 | 98.75 | 2.09 | 26.68 | 0.8 | 142.0300 | -52.8680 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 3D plot shows the distribution of HBL candidates against the 3FGL blazar subclasses HBL [blue], IBL [green] , LBL [ red ].
All the candidates lie in the clean HBL area validating the ANN results that classified the target as HBL sources.
TeV candidates
We compare the extrapolated fluxes of the candidates against the sensitivity of present IACTs and the future CTA. We used the Fermi-LAT spectral shape of the sources obtained in the range between 0.1 and 300 GeV using the best-fit model parameters from the LAT 4-year 3FGL Catalogue and particularly we referred to the spectral model that fits the data.
We compare the extrapolated fluxes with the CTA sensitivity for 50 hours (5hours) of observations as a solid (dashed) grey line.
Above a declination of 0 degrees we use the sensitivity of the northern array and the southern array otherwise.
The CTA sensitivity for 5 hours of observations is similar to that of currently operating IACTs for 50 hours of observations except a higher threshold energy of ~ 80 GeV.