Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

 beam energy

CU position and impact point

CU configuration 

tagged

statistics 

estimated time (hrs) 

purpose 

 2.5

 0 degrees through twr3

 BT1

 no (full-brem)

2M

5 (overnight)

PSF for flight tower

 2.5

"

 "

 yes

100K

 2.5

 PSF+Erecon for flight tower

 1.5

"

 "

 yes

100k

 2.5

 "

 1

"

 "

 yes

100K

 2.5

 "

 0.5

"

 "

 yes

150k 

 4

 "

 2.5

 30 degrees impact twr3 through twr2

 "

 yes

100k

 2.5

 PSF+Erecon tower dependence

 1.5

"

 "

 yes

100k

 2.5

 "

 1

 "

 "

 yes

 100k

 2.5

 "

 0.5

 "

 "

 yes

 150k

 4

 "

 1

20 degrees, impact on twr3 through twr2, impact point 1

 "

yes

100k

2.5

Erecon

 1

20 degrees, impact on twr3 through twr2, impact point 2

 "

 yes

100k

2.5

 "

 0.5

tagger calibration for 100mev gammas

 

 

 

 8

move tagger, improve resolution for 500mev primary beam

 0.5

0 degrees through twr3

 

 

 150K

 5

PSF+Erecon for flight tower for 100mev well-tagged gammas

 0.5

30 degrees impact twr3 through twr2

 

 

 150K

5

PSF+Erecon for flight tower for 100mev well-tagged gammas

 0.5

20 degrees, impact on twr3 through twr2, impact point 1

 

 

 150K

 5

PSF+Erecon for flight tower for 100mev well-tagged gammas

 Electron for CAL calibration

 beam energy

CU position and impact point

 CU configuration

tagged

statistics 

estimated time (hrs) 

purpose 

  5 

 0 degrees through twr1, 12 positions ?
x 2(XY)

 BT16  BT? (4rng, NZS,ext trigger)

NA

2M

10k per 12 pos

3 5 (overnight)

scan logs for intercalibration, verify if need to redo calibrations after pile-up rejection

 

 

1. study nuclear interactions : shape in CAL and TKR, Mip Finder, check MC
+++ BT-1 configuration
 + proton, 0 degree, 10-5-1 GeV/c, tower 3
 + proton, 30 degrees, 10-5-1 GeV/c, tower 3 (gia fatto mi sembra)
 + proton, 60 degrees, 10-5-1 GeV/c, tower 3

...