...
LAC distribution
LAC thresholds distribution for nomSciOps (runs 236096298,236102471,236108455)
LAC thresholds distribution for conSciOps (run 236084237)
Face # 1
LAC distribution and pedestal drift for LEX8 channel obtained with calibGenCal code
Here is the list of the channel with important drift (this is the output of the caliGenCal code)
...
here is the histogram for T6L7C4F1
Face # 0
LAC distribution and pedestal drift for LEX8 channel obtained with calibGenCal code
FLE, FHE distribution
Face # 1
FLE and FHE distribution obtained with calibGenCal code
Face # 0
FLE and FHE distribution obtained with calibGenCal code
Events distribution : variable CalMaxEne
...
CalMaxEne>>hnoflenofhe","CalMaxEne>0 && (GemConditionsWord==1 || GemConditionsWord==2 || GemConditionsWord==3 )
events with N0 FLE and N0 FHE trigger
FHE and FLE distributions from Zach's code
X axis is channel ID (twr*192+lyr*24+col*2+face). Y axis is energy of triggered channel. This code only finds one hit per triggered tower, as full trigger info is not present in standard config LPA data.
It would appear that the Cal trigger thresholds are unanimously biased conservative by about 20% for FHE & 30% for FLE. It should be noted that these calibrations are based on very old LCI data. Thankfully we will be recalibrating very soon.
here are same plots for nomSciOps, runs 0236096298, 0236102471, 0236108455.
Plot below shows distribution of detected FLE & FHE triggers for each channel. All 6144 triggers are present & all have been detected to fire at least once. Data is from runs
0236084237, 0236090205, 0236096298, 0236102471. Remember that our monitoring software can only detect a small fraction of Cal triggers.