You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Agenda

  • A working discussion of GCRTrack and GCRSelect layouts flowchart class diagram
    • How do they fit into existing recon?
    • Inputs?
    • What do they do (i.e. what are the functional "boxes" in the flow chart)?
    • How do they talk to each other?
    • Outputs
    • Any other questions from Claudia and Fred (or anyone else)
  • What next for GCRTrack and GCRSelect?
  • Eric N. GSI analysis update

    Attendees

    Mark Strickman
    Claudia Lavalley
    Fred Piron
    Sasha Chekhtman
    Zach Fewtrell

    Eric Grove
    Andrey Makeev
    Benoit Lott
    Eric Nuss

Notes

GCR Recon Discussion
  • Do we assume that GCR Recon will take place in a separate "pipeline" from normal processing?
    • Dedicated GCR pipeline Con:
      • On one hand, much of the processing (TKRRecon(question) CalXtalResponse) is the same as normal events
      • Using same pipeline may mean that output could be in standard recon.root file (same file as normal events)
      • Dedicated pipeline means a new root file (GCRRecon.root) would be required (maybe same format as recon.root)
    • Dedicated GCR pipeline Pro:
      • Rerunning GCR alone is more difficult (especially a problem early on)
      • Full recon.root is quite large => alot of unnecessary reads
      • In general, retrieval from a smaller, dedicated GCRRecon.root file would be easier
      • GCRRecon.root could be merged into recon.root later if necessary
    • General consensus is that dedicated GCR pipeline is desireable

Next meeting: Feb 15

  • No labels