You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

We are interested in validating/comparing the PingER derived throughputs with those obtained by the Ookla Speed test measurements. I therefore contacted Ookla by email on November 27, 2007 and Mike Apgar and Doug Suttles of Ookla were kind enough to reply, answer questions, and on December 6, 2007 provide data suitable for importing into Excel (CSV format) and analyzing.

 Ookla Speedtest.net Information

Ookla maintains a fleet of speed-testing servers all over the world. A user chosen server downloads a file of incompressible data  to the user's client and then uploads it. They calculate the throughput by knowing the amount of data transferred and then dividing this by the time taken to transfer the data in each direction.  A summary of this data is provided to the client user in real-time showing average download speed, upload speed, and ping Round Trip Time (RTT).

At the time of the data, Ookla speedtest.net had 193 servers in 68 countries. The most servers/country were US (54), Australia (7),  Russia(6), Brazil, Canada, Romania (5).  A map of the locations of the servers and the number of servers / country is seen below.

Map of Ookla servers  

Ookla servers/country


The data is also archived together with the location of the client. This is determined based on the client IP address. Speedtest.net uses GeoIP databases from MaxMind to position the client and by default locate the closest server since the transfer speed depends on the TCP window and TCP is not usually optimized for increased RTT. While the information in MaxMind's GeoIP databases is very accurate, it is not perfect. More information on Ookla's speed test can be found here.

Ookla then uses the 95th percentile speeds for the IP address of each client. This way if a connection speed improves over time (or a better testing server for the region is added), it will improve the overall results. The same can be said for degradation of speed. These 95th percentile speeds are then what are averaged to determine the speeds shown in their data set. The ip_addresses column is the number of unique IP addresses from a specific country that have taken a test at Speedtest.net. The file provided contained aggregated data with one line for each country. It included data from 174 countries. The columns contained: the Top Level Domain, the Country name, the number of IP addresses, the average donload speed in kbits/s, the average upload speed in kbits/s. The data for each country was from >= 100 IP addresses.

Results 

A rough summary of the results shows: US has most IP addresses = 5.7M. Highest download speed is Japan=11Mbits/s, followed by Sweden, Latvia, Romania, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Singapore, Germany, France, US. Slowest download speed is Cameroon (199kbits/s) followed by Mauritius, Botswana, Angola, Madagascar, Nepal, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Tanzania, Kenya (i.e. bottom 5 in Africa). Fastest upload is Japan (5.1Mbits/s) followed by Russia, Romania, Sweden, Bulgaria, Latvia, Hong Kong, Lithuania, S. Korea, Moldova. The large number of Eastern European countries is interesting and not understood. The slowest download speeds are Madagascar (70kbits/s), followed by Yemen, Angola, Cameroon, New Caledonia, Botswana, Uruguay, Nepal, Zambia, French Polynesia (276 kbits/s). 50% of the slowest 10 download speed countries are in Africa.The median upload speed (303kbis/s) is 1/3 of the median download speed. Currently the African representation by country is only 26 (out of I think 54). It will be interesting to see if this improves as more measurements are made.

A map of the Ookla dowmload and upload throughputs measured for clients in the various countries of the world is shown below. The poor coverage for Sub-Saharan Africa (there was no data for countries in white) is seen as is the much better performance for developed regions such as N. America, Europe, Japan and Australaisia compared to developing regions. Also on the right we show a map of the ratios for upload/download.

Map of Ookla Download Speedtest throughputs 

Map of Ookla Upload Speedtest Throughputs

Map of Ookla Speedtest ratio of Upload/Download


Ookla Speedtest.net Upload versus Download Throughputs

A scatter plot of  the Ookla upload versus download throughput speeds is seen below on the left. Also the ratio of upload/download is seen in the map to the right above. In all cases the download exceeds the upload speed. The best value for the ratio of up/down is 80% (Azerbaijan). The worst is 9% (Portugal), the median is 34% +- 17%. It is seen that several Eastern European countries such as Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, and Moldova  have anomalously high upload throughput speeds. Looking at the map of Ookla servers and reviewing he locations of Ookla servers in December 2007 there were 6 in Russia, 5 in Romania and 3 in Bulgaria. Presumably these servers can provide high throughput for clients.  Several countries in Western Europe such as Portugal, Belgium, France and Germany have anomalously low upload throughput speeds. This may be the servers, or possibly the broadband is configured very asymmetrically. The figure below shows bar charts of the ratio of upload/download together with the download speeds, plus histograms of the ratio and download throughput.

Ookla Upload vs download speed

Ratio of Ookla upload/download and the Download speeds

Histogram of Ookla upload/download ratio

Histogram of Ookla Download throughputs


Evaluation versus PingER Normalized Derived Throughput (NDT) 

To validate whether the order of magnitude of the throughputs measured by Ookla agreed with those derived from the PingER losses and Round Trip Time (RTT) measurements we plotted the Ookla speedtest download measurements versus the Normalized Derived throughputs (NDT) from Pinger.  It is seen that the order of magnitudes agree and there is a good positive correlation (R2 ~ 0.53). To see how well the Ookla speedtest download results agreed with those of the ZDnet's Australia Speedtest (though the name Speedtest appears in both they are not related) we also plotted the two speedtests against one another. As a comparison we also show the ZDnet Speedtest results vs. the PingER NDT.

PingER NDT vs.  Ookla speedtest transfer rate

ZDnet Speedtest vs Ookla Speedtest

ZDnet speedtest vs PingER  NDT

  • No labels