You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Issue

e-mail from Chuck

Yoon, Chun Hong <yoon82@slac.stanford.edu> 2023-01-24 10:13pm
Hi Mikhail,
I came across a user working on xpplw3319 dataset. It seemed that our LCLS mask was not sufficient for their analysis.
Please see attached 4 detector averaged over multiple events and 4 detector masks (run293, epic_alc1,2,3,4).
Do you think setting more conservative parameters in selecting bad pixel map would help in this case?
Best,
Chuck

Dataset

xpplw3319 run 293, dark run 287

datinfo -e xpplw3319 -r 293 -d epix_alc1
   EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.1)', alias='epix_alc1')
   EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.2)', alias='epix_alc2')
   EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.3)', alias='epix_alc3')
   EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.4)', alias='epix_alc4')

[I] L0120: calibDir: /cds/data/psdm/xpp/xpplw3319/calib

Average image and mask for four detectors

Dark processing check

https://pswww.slac.stanford.edu/lgbk/lgbk/xpplw3319/#eLog

Jul/16/2021 06:11:15 287 dark - Restored

Jul/16/2021 07:44:51 293

===
Restore 287 dark

/cds/data/psdm/xpp/xpplw3319/xtc/xpplw3319-r028*

det_ndarr_raw_proc -d exp=xpplw3319:run=287 -s XppGon.0:Epix100a.1

REFERENCES






  • No labels