This page is gathering any piece of information needed for the Beamtest Status presentation due to the Collaboration Meeting in November 2007 in Washington
Links
Meeting Main Page- Meeting Agenda - All Meetings Report - BT F2F in Washington
Template
- Clearly state what we understand and what we do not understand.
- How we're going to propagate Beamtest systematics to astrophysical measurements :o)
(Random) List of all analysis topics
- Photons
- Electrons
- Hadrons
- Hits and Clusters
- for All kind of particles
- There used to be a difference of behaviour between PS and SPS : we know now it was due to using CO2 in the Cerenkov
- Energy
- Absolute value
- Resolution
- Number of logs hit
- Longitudinal and Transverse shower profiles
- Tagger
- PSF measurement with smaller error bars ?
- Is MC understood ?
- G4 settings
- Range cuts
- Physics list
- Geometry and other tricks
- ACD
- Min/Max collection efficiency in MC
- backsplash measurement
- Verify Timing in GSI data (Martin)
- Quenching measurement at GSI (Thierry)
- Cluster Size for Ions at GSI and other particles (Leon)
- GEANT4 vs EGS5 vs Mars15 comparisons (David)
- CAL cristal segmentation (Philippe)
- TKR Hit deficit evaluation after data reprocessing (Nicola)
- Bari digitization algorithm
- TKR Alignment : bug fixed, are we fine ? (Leon)
- Calorimeter alignment with the CU/Tracker (Michael)
- CAL XTalk measurement and correction (Sasha)
- Tkr hot/dead/masked trips
- Many pion studies (Berrie)
- Positron annihilation in MMS
- Gamma-background produced in MMS by protons (Alex)
- CAL pedestal drift
- High rates in the tracker
- CsI Scintillation afterglow (Benoit)
- Tkr FIFO analysis (Johan)
- CAL FHE/FLE study Autorange (ULD) (Tomi)
- Albedo runs
- Background study runs
- Beam spot : Tuning, Gaps and Fiducial cuts
- EM Shower development
- Very high level reconstruction variables : Tkr1CoreHC, CalTransRms...
- Cerenkov pressure scan and scaled energy (Philippe)
Other topics/ideas
- Selection of beam test-like events from orbits data
- Agreement Matrix and BtSysTest
- Material Audit : TKR and CAL, possible improvements
Some comments (luca)
Talk should have a list of
- understood (i.e. reproduced)
- angular resolution (tagged+FB+electrons)
- energy resolution (spread and tails, not average value)
- backsplash: are we happy with current strong cuts to reproduce that in MC?
- trigger efficiency (do we have CAL-LE and CAL-HE plots similar to what nicola made for TKR? CNO efficiency? important for effective area)
- general g4 behaviour and implementation (comparison with other simulators, beam line simulation)
- CAL calibration (xtalk, non-linearities) - BUT how is SPS cross-calibration compatible with the GSI calibration and how do we calibrate in flight?
- Material audit (TKR+CAL): how much more X0 do we expect from modifications to CAL geometry?
- effects of material along beam line, i.e. no coherent improvement on both TKR and CAL discrepancies
- effects of LE physics list and range cuts
- optimized (but not perfect) hadronic physics list
- NOT understood
- hit deficit in MC (and clusters)
- log deficit in MC and overall raw energy scale
- plans to assess
- effects of discrepancies on background rejection (data-like simulations, we MUST devise and show a plan here, we have been talking about this for too long now)
- how do we play with shower shape in g4?