You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Reprocessing P130 used the new ft2Util code to produce FT2 files.

Here I present the comparison between the files produced during P130 and the old files, archived in the astro server and produced with the old code. All plots refers to 1s FT2 files, unless otherwise stated.

For each quantity q in the FT2 file I report a histogram of the fractional difference between the "new" FT2 file (from P130) and the "old" one (from the archive): (qNEW-qOLD)/qOLD.

There are two main reasons for the small differences observed in the comparison:

  1. The new code does a better job at the margin of the runs: the spacecraft position and attitude (and related quantities) are computed starting from messages in the Magic 7 file. The new code uses the whole M7 file, which usually cover a broader time interval than the run, to compute position and attitude at the start time and end time of the run. The old code, instead, discarded all the messages before the start and after the stop of the run, computing position and attitude at those instants by extrapolation.
  2. A bug in the old code (see below for explanations)

Quantity

Columns in the FT2 file

Histograms

Comment

Bin start and stop

START, STOP

No differences. Actually, there will be differences, because of a different strategy of handling gaps between the new and the old code described in the "mother page". But for this comparison I have chosen only bins in common between the version from the reprocessing and the archived version.

Spacecraft position in ECI coordiantes (x,y,z)

SC_POSITION array

The differences in a very small number of bins are most probably due to Reason 1 above.

Ground point latitude and longitude

LAT_GEO, LON_GEO

Reason 1.

Spacecraft altitude

RAD_GEO

Reason 1.

Zenith direction

RA_ZENITH, DEC_ZENITH

 

McIlwain coordinates

L_MCILWAIN, B_MCILWAIN

 

Geomagnetic latitude

GEOMAG_LAT

16 percent of the time bins are in the underflow bin of the histogram. This is due to a known issue: on Feb. 2, 2010 we changed the quantity from unsigned to signed. Thus, all old FT2 files produced before that date have a always-positive GEOMAG_LAT, while the reprocessed ones have it signed from the beginning of the mission.

South Atlantic Anomaly flag

IN_SAA

 

Z-axis direction

RA_SCZ, DEC_SCZ

Reason 1.

X-axis direction

RA_SCX, DEC_SCX

Reason 1.

Orbital Pole direction

RA_NPOLE, DEC_NPOLE

Here there are considerable differences, because the new code compute the coordinates of the Orbital Pole in a different way respect to the old one. If vi is the position vector for the i-th bin in the FT2 file, the old code computed the orbital pole vector for the i-th bin as the cross product between vi-1 and vi, while the new code uses the product vi cross vi+1. See next section for more information.

Rocking angle

ROCK_ANGLE

Reason 1.

LAT GNC mode

LAT_MODE

 

LAT Configuration

LAT_CONFIG

 

Data quality flag

DATA_QUAL

Need to check why there are these differences in a couple of runs. I suspect those are BAD runs, or runs with the new values for the DQM flag.

Attitude quaternion

QSJ_1,QSJ_2,QSJ_3,QSJ_4

Reason 1.

Live time

LIVETIME

Differences are due to the bug already found in the old FT2 code. See below.

Livetime

As already found in my former test (see the mother page), the old code had a bug in the livetime computation. Here I show the difference in livetime between the two codes, as function of time:

  • No labels