You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Present: Amber Boehnlein, Ashley Deacon, Richard Dubois, Thomas Eriksson, Stuart Marshall, Randy Melen, Nan Spiers

DLP: Nan

The Symantec DLP PII scanner was disabled last week, pending a re-evaluation. Nan will be leading the effort to try again and will be sure to go through the project process and get guinea pigs from the science community to try it out before re-deployment. Her feeling was that the existing tool can do the job; it just needs to be better configured before letting it out in the wild again.

Hardware for FY12:

PPA seems to be doing most of the buying. Amber has the list. We are still querying AD and LCLS to see if more might be coming.

A question came up in PPA about updating the interactive login severs - the norics and yakuts. The latter are SL6 machines, and suspected to be only used by PPA. Amber will conduct a survey to see who uses the norics (and yakuts) before the next steps of an upgrade path and funding scheme.

Review of CD:

The next notable step for the SCSC is the review of the computing division's scientific computing activities. This has been slated for the fall timeframe. We want this to be a positive experience, educating people in what CD does and trying to see what could profitably be done differently.

There was some discussion about how to do this in a review process - one in which we plan to have external reviewers. One suggestion was to have a pre-review, say in September, where the CD folks give a fairly high level review of their current practices, then use this as lead in to a more in-depth review with the external reviewers later in the year. No conclusion yet. There are already constraints in September, so we'll need to nail down any dates soonish.

Scientific Computing Processes

While looking over the list, it was felt that we should first identify what we expect to happen in scientific computing: who the players are and what their roles and responsibilities are. This turns out to capture the process list that we showed at the workshop.

A draft of the 'execution plan' has been started and will get fleshed over the course of a couple of weeks.

Recap of Workshop Postmortem - Amber
Miscellany

Thomas noted that there are no links evident in the SLAC web to confluence or the forum. You need to know where they are to find them. We should figure out some good places to link in to them. [I wonder where sharepoint gets pointed from? (I wonder where sharepoint gets pointed from?)

It was felt that the forum tool needs easier notification schemes and that success will depend on people being told that there is new content, rather than expecting them to browse the forum regularly.

  • No labels