Our current model is to keep all current data on disk with a copy on tape. Reprocessings would require us to roll off the old data on the fly to make room for the new.
We had a meeting on Aug 4, with Eric Charles, Tom Glanzman, John Bartelt, Wilko Kroeger, Tony Johnson and Richard Dubois to discuss options.
Basic numbers:
The current model was driven by the perception that fetching from tape was dead slow. This is no longer the case; now we can consider being tape based.
Issues:
We need to order more disk and tape now, so we will stick with the current model. The next order should be in about 6 months; we agreed that would be a deadline for testing this new model. Now we need a plan and schedule for that testing.
1 Comment
Tom Glanzman
Another issue is access to migrated/purged files. There appear to be multiple approaches (automatic/synchronous, pre-stage, and manual) each with technical (e.g., time delays) and policy (e.g., production and user-induced load) implications.