Text in the excerpt box will show up in lists of meetings.KB mirrors, alternate beam path, scope conversations, target and flagship requirements into Jama
Discussion items
Time
Item
Who
Notes
Walk - in / out
KB mirrors. Asked Diling why XPP goes with transfocator, not KB pair.
Per Diling: Much easier to change spot size based on XPP user requests
Based on Diling's experience, our flexibility to change focus on demand is reduced.
Long effort for changing focus in current implementation.
This goes away from what David Fritz says. Diling has never seen this in practice. Diling not sold on the ease of changing focus with mirror bending.
Worrisome that this is something that is possible in principle but worry about practice
Achromaticity is a sure benefit
KB implies a different path through the chamber than lenses.
Experiments go als
Also discussing beam path below grade and what control room we would use.
Kai is asking engineers to refer to a facility not supporting the upgrades in CDR 11.2 not as "FES Base" but rather "FES minus explicitly designed upgrades" ("FES -EDU")
Cavern space looks very constrained when considering beam delivery, dumping and access.
Mikael has a request to consider what the impact would be of living in FES -EDU world.
Requirements transcription into Jama - needing help
Engineers are working from one incomplete slide deck to figure out requirements - slide deck had a configuration (inadvertently?) deleted back in September.
As a consequence, Brice was surprised to learn that we might want a dual target for some experiments (e.g. ion heating target)