Date
Attendees
Overview
Text in the excerpt box will show up in lists of meetings.Discuss Jama entry and reviews in progress; 3ω decision and "FES scope" laser requirements
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
| | | |
| Jama reviews |
| - Eric reviewed how to make entries and we made a new structure for the X-ray beamline requirements
- It's easy to expand details or move items.
- Reviews now show basis and verification method when reviewing
- We are leaving the engineers out for now.
|
| Mission-based requirements for Jama |
| |
| Going back to 3ω |
| - This is a question about FES scope when we're making a 1 kJ class laser.
- What do we lose if we normalize to the same ablation pressure and go to 3ω?
- What do we gain if we normalize to the same ablation pressure and go to 3ω?
- Advantage of going to higher pressure while avoiding electron heating
- Speckles are smaller; some relaxation on phase plate, all else equal
- In generating a strong magnetic field with a current loop: hot electrons are detrimental for diagnostics
- Will we get to the same magnetic fields though?
- Reference.
|
Action items