Issue
e-mail from Chuck
Yoon, Chun Hong <yoon82@slac.stanford.edu> 2023-01-24 10:13pm Hi Mikhail, I came across a user working on xpplw3319 dataset. It seemed that our LCLS mask was not sufficient for their analysis. Please see attached 4 detector averaged over multiple events and 4 detector masks (run293, epic_alc1,2,3,4). Do you think setting more conservative parameters in selecting bad pixel map would help in this case? Best, Chuck
Dataset
xpplw3319 run 293, dark run 287
datinfo -e xpplw3319 -r 293 -d epix_alc1
EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.1)', alias='epix_alc1')
EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.2)', alias='epix_alc2')
EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.3)', alias='epix_alc3')
EventKey(type=psana.Epix.ElementV3, src='DetInfo(XppGon.0:Epix100a.4)', alias='epix_alc4')
[I] L0120: calibDir: /cds/data/psdm/xpp/xpplw3319/calib
Average image and mask for four detectors
REFERENCES
Overview
Content Tools