Current analysis

Average amplitude and RMS over pads for some of runs from the range 898-914

run 898 dark rate:

run 898 att=0.1

run 902 att=0.005

run 909 att=1 low gain

CSpad images for runs 898-914

Bad pixel map

Use file provided by Philip Hart to remove all bad pixel-channels:

Exceptional pixel file for Cspad1 made from xppcom10/525 and xpp23210/449

• 1=very hot (>20 ADU in pedestal run) - 134 pixels, or 0.02%
• 2=hot (>10 ADU in pedestal run) - 5026 pixels, or 0.9%
• 4=dead (noise < 3 ADU in data run - almost all at 0 or 1 ADU) - 698 pixels, or 0.1%

All marked pixels are removed from further analysis

run 898 dark rate for high gain mode; plor shows the dark rate difference between low and high gain r898-907

run 899 att=0.1 (dark rate is subtracted using r898)

run 900 att=0.02 (dark rate is subtracted using r898)

run 901 att=0.002 (dark rate is subtracted using r898)

run 902 att=0.005 (dark rate is subtracted using r898)

run 903 att=0.005 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 904 att=0.1 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 905 att=0.5  low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 906 att=1  low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 907 dark image for low gain

run 908 dark image for low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907) Difference between two dark rate images

run 909 att=1 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 910 att=1 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 911 att=1 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907) Detector is moved for few mm

run 912 att=0.1 low gain (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 913 att=0.1 low gain with wires (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

run 914 att=0.1 low gain with wires (dark rate is subtracted using r907)

<- NON tilted 2x1                              Tilted 2x1->

Manipulation with images

Difference between runs 904(before move) - 912(moved), both runs att = 0.1