Used EM v4r060302p23 as reference as this is what we currently have in the pipeline.
For SurfaceMuons_2Tower I see some differences in the MC x and y position of the original particle. I'm not sure what why - same problem that you reported on
this morning Julie? Note that nearly all the events are out of range for these histograms.
I see the same differences for the test SurfaceMuons_twoTower (which uses calibrations, but is otherwise identical to SurfaceMuons_2Tower). There is also a
change for SurfaceMuons_oneTower, but less pronounced.
A change is also seen for gamma_100_mev_normal_oneTower but here we only see the tail of the distribution so it's difficult to know if it's the same change.
For gamma_100_mev_normal_twoTower only the x position seems to be different - y is ok. For these two tests the 'MC Int xtal segment number' seems shifted down for the
first 2/3 of the distribution.
For the two VDG tests there are CAL ADC and digi column differences. Not sure if they are a problem or not.
1 Comment
Anders W. Borgland
Used EM v4r060302p23 as reference as this is what we currently have in the pipeline.
For SurfaceMuons_2Tower I see some differences in the MC x and y position of the original particle. I'm not sure what why - same problem that you reported on
this morning Julie? Note that nearly all the events are out of range for these histograms.
I see the same differences for the test SurfaceMuons_twoTower (which uses calibrations, but is otherwise identical to SurfaceMuons_2Tower). There is also a
change for SurfaceMuons_oneTower, but less pronounced.
A change is also seen for gamma_100_mev_normal_oneTower but here we only see the tail of the distribution so it's difficult to know if it's the same change.
For gamma_100_mev_normal_twoTower only the x position seems to be different - y is ok. For these two tests the 'MC Int xtal segment number' seems shifted down for the
first 2/3 of the distribution.
For the two VDG tests there are CAL ADC and digi column differences. Not sure if they are a problem or not.