You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Attendees: Ken Lauer Vinod Gopalan Barry Fishler Alex Wallace Peregrine McGehee Zachary L Lentz Mitchell Cabral Nate Landis Robert S. Tang-Kong 

Summary of Last Meeting:

LLNL Requirements:

  • Setpoint tool shall be able to write to multiple devices store various configurations of these values. 
  • The RRL devices shall have the ability to move through multiple configurations throughout the entire shot cycle, but does not require reconfiguration when shots are being taken. 
  • The tool shall provide the operator to check configurations on-demand.
  • There is no need for an atomic system as the time requirement to reach set configurations are in the hours range. 

LLNL NIF System:

  • At NIF setpoints can be created on-demand.
    • Ability to continuously monitor the state/value/parameters of the device and setpoint.
    • Can write to multiple devices at once.
  • NIF has an Oracle database that is used to maintain setpoints and configurations. 
      • Other systems have configuration files that live on local controllers.

ATEF (Work In Progress):

  • SLAC-developed tool for testing that can be used to verify and check configurations.
    • Moving towards setting configurations as well. 
    • Configuration control has not been planned yet.
  • ATEF is a work in progress and is not complete yet.

Goals:

  • Have device-level configuration and management pattern for all of MECU.
    • Find where we want to store configurations.
    • LLNL needs a very convenient means to verify configurations before firing.

Lingering Questions:

  • How are other large-scale EPICS systems managing this problem? The challenge being configuration management.
    • Device-obstruction layer that sat on the client layer. 
    • SLAC can reach out to other teams to see how they are running this. SLAC's AD division is doing something similar (SCORE).

2/8/2023 Notes:





  • No labels