...
| 
|
| Code Block |
|---|
enum MyClassFlags {doThingX, doThingY, doThingZ};
| | Code Block |
|---|
int obscureFlag; class MyClass {
MyClassFlags flags;
void setFlags(EnumSet f) {flags = f;}
}
...
xy.setObscureFlag(3
EnumSet<MyClassFlags> myFlags = new EnumSet<MyClassFlags>();
myFlags.add(MyClassFlags.doThingX); // yes, {color:red}NEVER hardcode numbers like this !!!{color}it is more verbose. That is a good thing !
MyClass c;
c.setFlags(myFlags);
|
| | Code Block |
|---|
class Obscure {
int obscureFlag;
void setObscureFlag(int o) {obscureFlag = o;}
}
...
Obscure o
o.setObscureFlag(3); |
|
| Note |
|---|
Never hardcode numbers |
"Overloaded Operators"
It is very confusing to have members like add(Object o1, Object o2) as members of the classes. This is counter-intuitive. Either there ought to be a supporter class with static members only, or the member of the type class expects only one argument.
So, design it to look like this:
...
