Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

 

By  Les Cottrell and Shahryar Khan

Installations

In March and April 2007 we worked with people from Palestine and the University at Buffalo to install PingER measurement Measurement Points (MPs) in Al Quds University in Ramallah (AQU) in Abu Dis on the West Bank and the Islamic Islamic University of Gaza (IUG) in Gaza City. They were both connected to the Mediterranean fibre optic cable though at first the host used at AQU was routed through Barak an Israeli commercial Internet porovider. There is a probability the Palestinian hosts will lose their connection to the Mediterranean fibre optic cable in Summer 2007.

AQU successfully installed PingER Al Quds successfully installed PingER2 without help. It has been measuring and reporting since march March 23, 2007. It has been very reliable with no few losses of data.

Warren Matthews had to step of Georgia Tech stepped in and assist IUGaza in getting PingER2 running. There were problems with the cronjob and possibly ntpd. IUGaza IUG has been monitoring successfully since April 7th, 2007. They did not monitor data all day on April 22. There have been problems on 2 days gathering the data where I have either contacted the IUGaza site contact (Apr 28th to fix the web server) or had to re-run the gathering script (today). It was having problems again on May 3-7, 2007 and has been reported to the contact.

On April 3rd the Al-Quds Open University (OAU) in Ramallah said they would prepare a new machine and install software. I responed responded on April 4th and April 17th, but have heard nothing since. I prompted them again today.5/4/07 and 5/9/07.

The locations of the sites are shown below.

Image Added

Pinger Coverage

Include Page
Pinger Deployment
Pinger Deployment

Worldwide Comparison

Include Page
Worldwide Comparison
Worldwide Comparison

MOS for various Regions

Include Page
MOS
MOS

TCP throughput from CERN & SLAC to World Regions 

Include Page
CERN View
CERN View

Palestine 

Routes

The main Autonomous System  (AS) domains in the routes from SLAC to the Middle East countries for the sites we monitor are shown in the figure to the left below. It can be seen that many providers are used. Al Quds connects to PADI2. The Palestinian sites (Gaza and the West Bank) use different providers from each other and from the neighboring countries. The figure on the right shows the ASs used to route from AQU to various countries of the world.

Image AddedImage Added

Routes Al Quds University to Middle East Countries

All routes from Al-Quds University (Palestine, West Bank) except to OAU go via Israel. Al-Quds is connected to OAU via PADI2 with an E1 link from Al-Quds. There are three hops all in the PADI2 ASN and the distance is a << 100 miles. The link is heavily congested during work hours. However, even when 25% congested  the traceroute measured from Al-Quds University is close to 90 ms.  This maybe due asymmetric routing

Routes to other than OAU and the Islamic University of Gaza also usually go via Europe to other Middle Eastern Countries.
The route from Al-Quds (Palestine West Bank) to Cyprus goes via Israel, Europe, United Kingdom.
The route to Iran goes via Israel, Europe, Turkey and then reaches Iran.
From Al-Quds to Jordan goes via Israel, US (Kansas), France and then reaches Jordan.
From West Bank to Gaza goes via Israel.
To Turkey goes via Israel, Europe and then reaches Turkey.
From Palestine to UAE goes via Israel, Europe, UK and then goes to Dubai.
From Palestine to Oman goes via Israel, Germany, Italy and then reaches Oman. 
Here is a map of connectivity from Al Quds to other Middle East Countries.

Routes Al Quds University to Other Countries

Palestine to China: Palestine->Israel->Germany->Japan->China;
Palestine to US*:* Palestine-> Israel -> Europe-> US (California);
Palestine to New Zealand: Palestine -> Israel -> US (Florida) -> US (Kansas) -> US (New Mexico) -> New Zeland;
Palestine to Australia:  Palestine-> Israel ->Europe -> US(Kansas) -> Australia;
Palestine to Russia: Palestine -> Israel -> Germany -> Russia(Moscow);
Palestine to Pakistan:  Palestine -> Israel -> Europe -> Italy -> Pakistan;
Palestine to Greece:  Palestine -> Israel -> Europe -> United Kingdom -> Greece;
Palestine to Taiwan: Palestine -> Israel -> US (Kansas) -> Tiawan;
Palestine to India: Palestine -> Israel -> Germany -> Netherlands -> United Kingdom -> India;
Palestine to Chile: Palestine -> Israel ->Germany -> US -> Mexico -> Chile;
Palestine to Argentina: Palestine -> Israel -> Europe -> US (Kansas) -> US (Texas) -> Argentina;
Palestine to Switzerland:  Palestine -> Israel -> Europe -> United Kingdom -> Switzerland;
Palestine to Egypt:  Palestine -> Israel -> Germany -> Netherlands -> United Kingdom -> Egypt.

Round Trip Times, Losses and Througputs for Palestine with Various Regions

The hourly losses and RTTs seen from SLAC for Israel, Al Quds and IUGaza are shown below. It is seen that israel has almost no variability so the link is un-congested. Both the Al Quds and IUGaza time series show strong diurnal changes indication congestion/queuing during work hours. Comparing Al Quds and IUGaza it appears they have similar minimum RTTs of about 250ms. IUGaza has improved with less congestion since April 17, 2007. Al Quds had two periods of unreachability (100% loss on the green line).
Image AddedImage AddedImage Added

The fallowing graph shows the daily TCP throughput seen from SLAC to Al Quds University, IUGaza and  the Palestine Standards Institution (www.psi.gov.ps). It can be seen that the performance is very variable, probably due to diurnal congestion. In addition IUGaza and the Palestinian Standards Institution have similar derived throughput, whil Al-Quds University is lower.

Image Added
 
The monthly average Round Trip Times (RTTs) from Al Quds and IUGaza are shown below. The individual data points  daily avergae(average_RTT) are shown to show the variability.
Image AddedImage Added  

The minimum RTTs are shown below with the individual points (since minimum RTTs are more stable). 

Image AddedImage Added
 The packets losses are shown below:

Image AddedImage Added