Page History
...
Code Block |
---|
CalibManager/app/ optical_metrology_check optical_metrology_epix10ka2m |
Code is not in git repo yet, psproxy does not work after winter break...
Results in
Code Block |
---|
/reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/epix10ka2m/calib-mfx-epix10ka2m-01-2018-11-15/ 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m.xlsx 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m.txt 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m-corr.txt 2018-11-15-geometry-epix10ka2m.txt - geometry file accounting for optical metrology data README-2018-11-15 |
Gain
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Blaj, Gabriel 2018-12-04, 2:08 PMO'Grady, Paul Christopher;Nelson, Silke;Dubrovin, Mikhail;Hart, Philip Adam Hi, You could try to use the gain files obtained with the pulser. They are not great but might work. For a better gain calibration, we should use single photon data. There is sufficient 1 photon data taken during the first testing at XCS, but it will take me a few days to calculate the gains. I would actually advocate returning the number of photons (as we discussed in a meeting a few months ago). Even without a calibration it can be easily calculated from the (average) gains: High (FH and AHL): 132 ADU/9.5 keV Medium (FM and AML): 43 ADU/9.5 keV Low (FL, AHL, AML): 1.32 ADU/9.5 keV (Just a note, while the pulser is not great for calibrating gains, it works fine for offset calibration) Thanks, Gabriel |
...
Overview
Content Tools