Page History
...
Comments on orientation of epix10ka2m parts from Matt
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Weaver, Matt Tue 10/92018-11-19, 37:0737 PMO'Grady, Paul Christopher;Dubrovin, Mikhail;Damiani, Daniel S. Hi Mikhail, We took radioactive source test Also, here'sruns sometoday descriptionto ofverify the nominal geometry. Pay closeWe attention to the last part that describes the positioning of ASICs within an "element". I think this might be different than before. -Matt // // Hard code the array's geometry for now // // (Epix10ka2m) // | // Quad 3 | Quad 0 Quad 1 is rotated 90d clockwise // found that we were rotated by 90 degrees, which matches the labeling on the back of the detector as well as the metrology picture from Chris Kenney. The runs are /reg/d/psdm/det/detdaq17/e968-r0131 - source unmasked (up to ~ event 10000), then masked vertically after ~ event 15000 /reg/d/psdm/det/detdaq17/e968-r0132 - source masked horizontally at bottom after ~ event 15000. So, the picture is... // (Epix10ka2m) // | // Quad 0 | Quad 1 Quad 2 is rotated 90d clockwise // -------+-------- Quad 23 is rotated 180d clockwise // Quad 23 | Quad 12 Quad 30 is rotated 270d clockwise // | // // (Quad 01) // | // Elem 0 | Elem 1 // -------+-------- No rotations // Elem 2 | Elem 3 // | // // (Elem 0) // | // ASIC 0 | ASIC 3 // -------+-------- No rotations // ASIC 1 | ASIC 2 // | | ||||
Code Block | ||||
| ||||
Weaver, Matt 2018-11-18, 6:14 PMDubrovin, Mikhail;O'Grady, Paul Christopher Here's the geometry I'm now using (below). Note that pixel(0,0) for each of the elements below is in the lower right hand corner. We'll know the quadrant layout for sure when we get the radioactive source exposure on Monday. // (Epix10ka2m) // // (Elem 0-3 pixel array) // row increasing // ^ // | // Quad 3 | Quad 0 Quad 1 is rotated 90d clockwise | // -------+-------- Quad 2 is rotated 180d clockwise // Quad 2 | Quad 1 Quad| 3 is// rotated 270dcolumn clockwise increasing <-- (0,0) |
Preliminary geometry
in /reg/g/psdm/detector/data_test/calib/
Code Block |
---|
/reg/g/psdm/detector/data_test/calib/Epix10ka2M::CalibV1/NoDetector.0:Epix10ka2M.0/geometry/0-end.data @/ | // // (Quad 0) // | (epix10ka2m //- Elem 0 | Elem 1 // -------+-------- No rotations // Elem 2 | Elem 3 // | // The ASICs did not move. The change is that the (352,384) array has pixel (0,0) in the lower right hand corner (in ASIC2). // (Elem 0) // | // ASIC 0 | ASIC 3 // -------+-------- No rotations // ASIC 1 | ASIC 2 // | // // (Elem 0-3 pixel array) // row increasing // ^ // | // | // column increasing <-- (0,0) |
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Weaver, Matt
2018-11-19, 7:37 PMO'Grady, Paul Christopher;Dubrovin, Mikhail
Hi Mikhail,
We took radioactive source test
runs today to verify the geometry. We found that we were rotated by 90
degrees, which matches the labeling on the back of the detector as well
as the metrology picture from Chris Kenney.
The runs are
/reg/d/psdm/det/detdaq17/e968-r0131 - source unmasked (up to ~ event 10000), then masked vertically after ~ event 15000
/reg/d/psdm/det/detdaq17/e968-r0132 - source masked horizontally at bottom after ~ event 15000.
So, the picture is...
// (Epix10ka2m)
// |
// Quad 0 | Quad 1 Quad 2 is rotated 90d clockwise
// -------+-------- Quad 3 is rotated 180d clockwise
// Quad 3 | Quad 2 Quad 0 is rotated 270d clockwise
// |
//
// (Quad 1)
// |
// Elem 0 | Elem 1
// -------+-------- No rotations
// Elem 2 | Elem 3
// |
//
// (Elem 0)
// |
// ASIC 0 | ASIC 3
// -------+-------- No rotations
// ASIC 1 | ASIC 2
// |
//
// (Elem 0-3 pixel array)
// row increasing
// ^
// |
// |
// column increasing <-- (0,0) |
Preliminary geometry
in /reg/g/psdm/detector/data_test/calib/
...
entire detector)
/reg/g/psdm/detector/data_test/calib/Epix10kaQuad::CalibV1/NoDetector.0:Epix10kaQuad.0/geometry/0-end.data @ (epix10kaquad - one quad)
/reg/g/psdm/detector/data_test/calib/Epix10ka::CalibV1/MecTargetChamber.0:Epix10ka.1/geometry/0-end.data @ (epix10ka - one panel) |
copy of geometry files in alignment examples /reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/
Code Block |
---|
/data_test/calib/Epix10kaQuad::CalibV1/NoDetector.0:Epix10kaQuad.0/geometry/0-end.data @ (epix10kaquad - one quad) /reg/g/psdm/detector/data_testdetector/alignment/epix10ka2m/calib/Epix10kaEpix10ka2M::CalibV1/MecTargetChamberNoDetector.0:Epix10kaEpix10ka2M.10/geometry/0-end.data @ (epix10ka - one panel) |
...
/reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment |
...
Code Block |
---|
/epix10kaquad/calib/Epix10kaQuad::CalibV1/NoDetector.0:Epix10kaQuad.0/geometry/0-end.data /reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/epix10ka2mepix10ka/calib/Epix10ka2MEpix10ka::CalibV1/NoDetectorMecTargetChamber.0:Epix10ka2MEpix10ka.01/geometry/0-end.data |
Optical metrology processing
Scripts for processing
Code Block |
---|
CalibManager/app/
optical_metrology_check
optical_metrology_epix10ka2m |
Results in
Code Block |
---|
/reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/epix10kaquadepix10ka2m/calib/Epix10kaQuad::CalibV1/NoDetector.0:Epix10kaQuad.0/geometry/0-end.data /reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/epix10ka/calib/Epix10ka::CalibV1/MecTargetChamber.0:Epix10ka.1/geometry/0-end.data-mfx-epix10ka2m-01-2018-11-15/ 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m.xlsx 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m.txt 2018-11-15-Metrology-epix10ka2m-corr.txt 2018-11-15-geometry-epix10ka2m.txt - geometry file accounting for optical metrology data README-2018-11-15 |
Gain
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Blaj, Gabriel 2018-12-04, 2:08 PMO'Grady, Paul Christopher;Nelson, Silke;Dubrovin, Mikhail;Hart, Philip Adam Hi, You could try to use the gain files obtained with the pulser. They are not great but might work. For a better gain calibration, we should use single photon data. There is sufficient 1 photon data taken during the first testing at XCS, but it will take me a few days to calculate the gains. I would actually advocate returning the number of photons (as we discussed in a meeting a few months ago). Even without a calibration it can be easily calculated from the (average) gains: High (FH and AHL): 132 ADU/9.5 keV Medium (FM and AML): 43 ADU/9.5 keV Low (FL, AHL, AML): 1.32 ADU/9.5 keV (Just a note, while the pulser is not great for calibrating gains, it works fine for offset calibration) Thanks, Gabriel |
...
/reg/g/psdm/detector/alignment/epix10ka2m/calib-mfx-epix10ka2m-01-2018-11-15
Overview
Content Tools