- Double-check the GuineaPig parameters that Anne used for the backscatter studies
- Double-check the field maps from the anti-DID and the final focussing magnets
- Double-check the Geant4 parameters that were used for those studies
- EM showers: What dynamic range is required for the readout?
- 500 GeV? 1000 GeV?
- Cell size for EMCal?
...
- Tracking performance (pt resolution) degraded from CDR to DBD
- low-pt tracking performance shows some strange features
- impact parameter resolution shows a charge-dependent bias
- forward region not optimized – two large clusters due to background in 1 TeV running
- Tracker layout not optimized for air cooling (disks close off the barrel)
- Tracker barrel aspect ratio not optimal. Barrel should be longer
- KPIX buffer too small in forward region
- Study of Neutron Flux (http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-tn-07-013.pdf)
- MAPS tracker – what's the advantage? --> Bristol
MAPS ECAL – is it better than the Analog ECAL?