Double-check the GuineaPig parameters that Anne used for the backscatter studies
Double-check the field maps from the anti-DID and the final focussing magnets
Double-check the Geant4 parameters that were used for those studies
EM showers: What dynamic range is required for the readout?
500 GeV? 1000 GeV?
Cell size for EMCal?
Tracking performance (pt resolution) degraded from CDR to DBD
low-pt tracking performance shows some strange features
impact parameter resolution shows a charge-dependent bias
forward region not optimized – two large clusters due to background in 1 TeV running
Tracker layout not optimized for air cooling (disks close off the barrel)
Tracker barrel aspect ratio not optimal. Barrel should be longer
KPIX buffer too small in forward region
Study of Neutron Flux (
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-tn-07-013.pdf
)
MAPS tracker – what's the advantage? --> Bristol
MAPS ECAL – is it better than the Analog ECAL?