Page History

...

•  peak occupancy vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  cluster size vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  cluster amplitude vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  S/N vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  time resolution vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  hit efficiency vs. layer - (Matt S.)
•  hit efficiency vs. momentum - (Matt S.)millepede_straight_step1.pdf
•  hit efficiency detailed - (Matt S.)
•  bias scan (cluster amplitude vs. L1 hit location) - (Matt S.)

Track Level:

•  track chi-squared (data vs. MC)
•  track parameters (data vs. MC)
•  track-cluster matching (data vs. MC)
•  tracking efficiency vs. momentum - (Matt G.)
•  track fake rate vs. momentum
•  track time resolution - (Omar)
•  momentum scale/resolution (top/bottom) - (Omar)
•  empty target tracking
•  alignment checks - (Alessandra)
  •  test of v4.4 geometry (used for 2016 pass0)
    
    •  u residuals (with GBL) checks
    •  phi and lambda kinks (after GBL)
  •  further tunings
    
    •  study of u rotations:
      
      •  profile plots, u residuals vs u coordinate, Mcarlo vs real data
      •  millepede minimization: rotations around w of 123, 456-slot and 456-hole stacks
    •  studies on straight tracks:
      
      •  part 1 (sep 20, 2016)
      •  part 2 (sep 27, 2016)
    •  study of weak modes: translations along z (straight & curved tracks)
      
      •  part 1 (oct 4, 2016)
      •  part 2 (oct 18, 2016)
    •  Millepede minimization on mixed tracks sample
      •  part 1 (oct 25, 2016)

...

Vertex Level:

•  vertex distributions (data vs. MC) - (Sho)
•  mass resolution? (mollers) - (Omar)

...