2016 Performance Studies

Key Talks and Information:

Hit Level:

• peak occupancy vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• cluster size vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• cluster amplitude vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• S/N vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• time resolution vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• hit efficiency vs. layer - (Matt S.)
• hit efficiency vs. momentum - (Matt S.)millepede_straight_step1.pdf
• hit efficiency detailed - (Matt S.)
• bias scan (cluster amplitude vs. L1 hit location) - (Matt S.)

Track Level:

• track chi-squared (data vs. MC)
• track parameters (data vs. MC)
• track-cluster matching (data vs. MC)
• tracking efficiency vs. momentum - (Matt G.)
• track fake rate vs. momentum
• track time resolution - (Omar)
• momentum scale/resolution (top/bottom) - (Omar)
• empty target tracking
• alignment checks - (Alessandra)
  • test of v4.4 geometry (used for 2016 pass0)
    
    • u residuals (with GBL) checks
    • phi and lambda kinks (after GBL)
  • further tunings
    
    • study of u rotations:
      
      • profile plots, u residuals vs u coordinate, Mcarlo vs real data
      • millepede minimization: rotations around w of 123, 456-slot and 456-hole stacks
    • studies on straight tracks:
      
      • part 1 (sep 20, 2016)
      • part 2 (sep 27, 2016)
    • study of weak modes: translations along z (straight & curved tracks)
      
      • part 1 (oct 4, 2016)
      • part 2 (oct 18, 2016)
    • Millepede minimization on mixed tracks sample
      • part 1 (oct 25, 2016)

Vertex Level:

• vertex distributions (data vs. MC) - (Sho)
• mass resolution (mollers) - (Omar)