Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Post any graphs/presentations, we can figure out how to organize as things get dumped in here. For now, make sure to include which beamtime data/runs you looked at, your name, data of analysis.


Table of Contents
outlinetrue


Single Photon Gain results

Image Added

Regardless the sagging area

Image Added



Here are some beamtime energy (Beam primary energies and fluorescent energies) linearity study below. (Zongde, Philip)



Investigation on sagging pixels

Image Added

Pixel [53,1] is a normal pixel, pixel [53,358] is in sagging area.

we can see the fitting line (forced across origin) deviates a lot compare with the normal pixel.


Some studies with @philip_adam_hart on the sagging region (high #column ), we take the photon counts ratio between single-pixel-cluster and single & double-pixel-cluster (run29, -50V), it seems like we have less two-photon cluster in sagging area (top: Module1, bottom: Module2)

Image Added


We got smoother date at -110V (run 148, primary beam energy 11kev )  

Image Added   Image Added

I guess the sensor really doesn't work well at -50V.