Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. nwfpuet, uettaxila, ustb (has never been any data), uob are down for several days: see http://www-iepm.slac.stanford.edu/monitoring/checkdata/). Who is responsible for keeping these nodes running?
  2. Zafar is verifying that table.pl at SEECS has all the known Pakistani monitors.
  3. UET, UOB, LSE, COMSATS do not have full set of Pakistani beacons. See matrix. The Pakistani monitoring nodes are supposed to get the beacon list from SEECS. – Anjum said he has a student who can fix but need password so they can fix the nodes so they get the list from the SEECS server. Is there any progress?
  4. There appears to be an anomaly in the RTTs to vle.iiu.edu.pk (AKA PK.IIU.EDU.N2) from the Pakistani monitors it is over 200ms while from SLAC as displayed in pingtable.pl it is 67ms. Yet if I do not think this host is in Pakistan. Someone should check the traceroutes and fix up the databaseit from the command line it is ~ 310ms from pinger. This needs investigating. Also www.iiu.edu.pk has an RTT from SLAC of 177ms. TULIP shows it as in Europe.
  5. Kashif Sataar of SEECS is managing the hosts and contacts host contacts in case of problems.
  6. Wiki Markup
    *\[Pending by Dr. Anjum\]*
     Problem with UPESH node, it is not pinging, a ping with custom target also doesn't work. Traceroute works. Moreover the node is pingable from SLAC which dismisses the possibility of pings being blocked.

...