Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Last Thursday (Sep 23, 2010) the LCI run has been collected for the first time after the failure of high energy ranges in the channel twr=4,lyr=2,col=4,face=0.

I've analysed analyzed the new LCI run and compared the results with previous LCI run collected on July 1, 2010. The comparison for the above mentioned channel before and after failureis failure is shown on the following plot:

LH panels = before failure
RH panels = after failure

Image Modified

Left 4 plots show the charge injection curves ADC vs DAC (pedestals are NOT subtracted) for 4 energy ranges (LEX8, LEX1, HEX8, HEX1) obtained from July LCI run, right prior to failure.  Life is normal.

Right 4 plots - show the same curves obtained from September run, after the failure.  Life is not normal.

In July all four curves were linear until saturation, in .  In September LEX8 and LEX1 curves are unchanged, while HEX8 and HEX1 curves show negative sign signal with ~50 times smaller amplitude. pedestals Pedestals are unchanged, and the ratio of HEX8/HEX1 (after pedestal subraction) is still correct (~9) - this .  This confirms that track and hold stages work, and the failure happened somewhere in preamp. The small negative signal we see is probably the result of parasitic coupling between preamp input and output. 

...