Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

JS: Looked at it and don't understand. Could try to understand, but just don't understand what it is doing. And not documented. Not derived from a documented algorithm. Did find the program it was based off of, used at SLD. Found page with FORTRAN comments but this is it. New fitter will be based off the BaBar algorithm.

NS: Just completed transition of full CCD simulation into org.lcsim. Debugged and had a hard time finding cm to mm bug. Completing comments to make JavaDocs. It works!

JM: Reported on TestBeam.

MR: Need new properties for a new detector?

TJ: Minimally need the compact description. Event display and browser only need compact. Need certain files for FastMC, etc.

Geometry is one parameter and others are auxiliary.

Could read separate file?

WL: Would be fragile.

Norman was thinking for sid00 to rename the readouts for more consistent names.

Hardwired into Lelaps?

WL: Should not be a problem.

Currently, Lelaps is using sampling fractions = 1.0 in all cases.

RF: SiD cal meeting on Thursday morning. Worth bringing up test beam stuff?

JM: Okay.

WL: Could add flag in LCIO run header whether sampling fractions are available or not.

RC: Could do it, but will get messy. As sampling fractions go beyond one number, will become much more complicated.

Flag if sampling fractions applied would be useful.