Current faster small vs somewhat random old run ASIC registers:
python config_compare_detector.py exp=cxilw3020:run=9 exp=mfxx36916:run=84 --secondDetNumber 1 --detType Epix10ka
The old data comes second; only registers with new values are listed. We didn't have CompEnOn on, or is_en set correctly, and R0_rst_en has changed. I don't see anything that's obviously crazy to me. I'll next compare the asic values to the quad-based camera settings.
Trimmed list:
['acqToAsicR0Delay'], 24000, 14032)
(['asicAcqLToPPmatL'], 259, 200)
(['asicAcqWidth'], 12969, 10000)
(['asicMask'], 15, 4)
(['asicR0ToAsicAcq'], 12969, 10000)
(['asicR0Width'], 39, 30)
(['asics', 0, 'CompEnOn'], 1, 0)
(['asics', 0, 'Pulser'], 10, 1023)
(['asics', 0, 'RO_rst_en'], 1, 0)
(['asics', 0, 'is_en'], 1, 0)
(etc with the other asics)
(['baseClockFrequency'], 129687500, 1048576)
issue with matching key, just continue epixDaqTrigDelay 64000
(['evrRunTrigDelay'], 11905, 1)
issue with matching key, just continue ghostCorrEn 1
issue with matching key, just continue oversampleEn 0
issue with matching key, just continue oversampleSize 0
(['scopeADCsameplesToSkip'], 0, 1)
(['scopeChanAwaveformSelect'], 0, 17)
(['scopeChanBwaveformSelect'], 4, 18)
(['scopeEnable'], 0, 1)
(['scopeTraceLength'], 4096, 8191)
(['scopeTrigChan'], 6, 4)
(['scopeTrigOffset'], 15, 3000)
Small ASIC settings vs quad:
I've looked at the asic register settings of the small 10k vs the quad format as discussed. I don't see anything obviously different that I'm familiar with. The ADC settings are a bit difficult to compare because the names are different or the registers just don't match up. Anyway what I noticed is below.
Small quad
pulsersync 0 1
DM1 0 1
DM2 1 0
AsicR0ClkHalfT 5 7