Page History
...
| Expand | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
I think we can move all fermilnx VMs to HA without oversubscribing memory or disk. Can we verify this? * I think each fermilnx VM, except for fermilnx01 and fermilnx02, has 384GB memory. * I think we have two VMWare Hypervisors in in HA. I'd suggest distributing the VMs such that: * fermilnx01 is on one hypervisor * fermilnx02 is on another hypervisor (I think this is currently the case) All other fermilnx-v* VMs are distributed between the other two hypervisors (live migration if possible) |
Juliyana's report on VMs in H.A.:
| Expand | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Currently Fermi has these hypervisors and VMS in HA and Non-HA
HA:
Fermilnx-v06/v07/08
Fermilnx01/02/04
NON-HA:
Fermi-ci-test01
Fermilnx-v02/v03/v04/v05/v10/v11/v12/v13/v14/v15/v16/v17/v18/v19 |
Excerpt from Christian Pama's spreadsheet on H.A. rack contents:
| Expand | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
fermi-vmclust02
fermi-vmclust03
fermilnx03-vmm
fermi-oracle03
wain031
staas-gpfs50
staas-gpfs51
sca-oracle01
scalnx02-vmm
scalnx10-vmm01
scalnx11-vmm02
scalnx12-vmm01
scalnx13-vmm02
|
Gotchas from the Dec 2017 outage
...
Overview
Content Tools