Return the 25% storage reserved for NFS back to xrootd
New NFS/GPFS service on former fermi-xrd01 and fermi-xrd02 (and wain069, wain071)
fermi-xrd01 and fermi-xrd02
Drain xroot data (~180 TB)
Swap 2x R610 with SCS-owned R720 machines
Rename (fermi-gpfs03 and fermi-gpfs04 ?)
Internet connectivity (1 x 10 Gbps per host ?)
Decide upon storage configuration
Number of spindles for Users/Groups (from wain025)
Number of spindles for production partitions (from wain026 and wain032)
Number of "spare" spindles for future expansion
Install GPFS (total capacity will be ~160 TB)
Migrate wain025, wain026, wain032 to new system
Select two wains for CNFS service (lots of memory + fast ethernet)
Drain xrootd data from wain069 and wain071 (~60 TB, both are unreliable hosts due to the Seagate disks)
Swap the 4x1Gb interface with 10Gb nic from wain080 and wain081
Rename hosts (fermi-cnfs01, fermi-cnfs02 ?)
Install GPFS and CNFS software
Configure so that wain025 partitions are handled in such a way that their activities do not negatively impact access to other partitions
Upgrade NFS service for LSST
Repurpose wain025 to replace wain006
Drain xroot from other wains that are to be retired
Retirement list:
wain026
wain032
wain006
wains that are unreliable (due to Seagate drives?)
wain053 (29TB to be moved)
wain054 (22TB)
wain055 (27TB)
wain056 (30TB, total = 108TB)
Retirement option: Given that wain05x are the newest and most powerful Sun servers in the cluster, we might consider swapping physical disks from wain017/019/020/021 with wain053/054/055/056, then retiring the older machines. Advantages include: newer hardware (~2 years difference), more powerful hardware (12 cores vs 4), more memory (32 GB vs 16), more flexibility if we again repurpose the machines in the future. Wilko rightfully points out that this option requires more labor. Is it worth the extra work?