...
They mainly touched on the tracker and benchmarking, with some side remarks on magnet and calorimetry
Overall
, they think the DBD is in a decent state and many of their comments are editorial.
We also explained,that given limited resources not everything is engineered en detail and the DBD is snapshot in time
Tracker
...
Lots of questions on the stability with power pulsing, the assumptions on material budget and so on. Also questions how we could further reduce the material budger
As I understood later this was driven by the LHC experience where material kept creeping up.
Also they pointed put about the lack of mentioning alignment in this chapter.
Also they were asking, whether we can use cosmics for alignment, which we can...
Other
On the magnet there were a few questions on feasibility and status.
Calorimeter chapter had two main comments, a why
- why we dropped the crystal calorimeter and
...
- some editorial comments, that this chapter is
...
- too long
Also at as side, the performance plots are lacking (as reco isn't done yet)
...