Potential Upgraded LYSO (0.5mm x 0.5mm pixel; 10mm long)

  • light-collection efficiency and SNR for single ~GeV positron light_collection.pdf
  • ATTENTION: the formula for the light-collection efficiency is wrong:
    I assumed 1.1 x 10^-3 for the light-collection efficiency:
    • move the camera closer (500 mm instead of 760mm)
    • use a lens with f=0.95 (Navitar)
    • assume that the light is reflected from the back side due to ESR (2pi instead of 4pi emission)
    • pi (0.95*50mm/2)^2 / (2pi* (500mm)^2)  = 1.1 x 10^-3


2024 Summer Downtime Changes

  • We removed the 1st LYSO to make space for the positron tracker installation
  • We moved the camera closer to the mirrors to improve light collection

2024 August: light collection

  • Camera: Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 camera (https://www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/cameras/cmos-cameras/C13440-20CU.html)



  • Lens specifications: 50mm focal length
  • Magnification factor: lower end of ruler (pixel 1864) 140mm marker: (pixel 345): 1 pixel (6.5 micrometer) ↔ (140 mm / (1864-345)): M =  140 mm / ((1864-345) * 6.5 micrometer)  = 14.18

  • Distance screen to lens: s; distance lens to sensor: s': thin-lens formula: 1/s + 1/s' = 1/f
    Magnification: M = s/s' = (s/f - 1) → s = 50mm (14.18 + 1) = 760 mm

  • LYSO dimensions: 2mm x 2mm → imaged to (2mm / (14.18*6.5 micrometer))^2 ~ 471 pixel
    We gain a factor of 16 if we reduce the crystal size to 0.5mm x 0.5mm
  • Light collection efficiency (lower estimate; doesn't take directionality of the emission into account; f-number: 1.2): pi (50mm / (2*1.2))^2 / (2 pi * (760 mm)^2) ~ 3.8 x 10^-4

LYSO setup MAY 2024 measurements

Full presentation: 9-24 presentation.pdf

LYSO1 seems to have a defect around some pixels, so only LYSO2 was used for analysis.  

Experimental setup (all measurements made in tunnel):

  1. dy = 67.36mm; obtained by using distance from PDC downstream pipe center and zero dispersion axis from PDC CAD model
  2. d_nom = 24.81 mm; obtained from d_nom at DTOTR1 (Spectrometer Energy Calibration) linearly scaled to LYSO2 z-position


Positron energy spectrum calculation steps:

  • Images of LYSO screens were collected by camera and averaged over shots (3000 shots for 0.1mm Al foil, 100 shots for 1mm Pb glass)
  • For background subtraction details, see presentation above
  • Images are projected along non-dispersion (x) axis to give plot of y position [px] vs counts per px 
  • px is converted to mm on both axes using resolution ~5.63 px/mm (calculated by comparing screen size on image to physical measurements made in tunnel)
  • Horizontal axis is converted from mm to GeV using the formula:


(All energies are in GeV)

  • Vertical axis is converted from counts per mm (dN/dy) to counts per GeV by chain rule:


  • GEANT4 simulation for Al used to calibrate from counts per GeV to positrons per GeV (Pb simulation is linearly scaled up by 3x to match data).  

(dotted lines represent part of spectrum where significant number of positrons are obstructed by the ceiling of the dipole exit window)

  • For 0.1mm Al foil data in the 2.5 GeV to 3.5 GeV range, total camera counts (14889 counts) are compared with the number of positrons from the simulation (1048 positrons) to give experimental calibration value of ~14 counts/positron.
  • Assuming dy is accurate to +/-1cm and d_nom is accurate to +/-7%, calibration value is accurate to +/- 2 counts per positron

Final experimental sensitivity: 14 +/- 2 counts per positron.



May 2024 Setup changes



No changes to mirrors or LYSO screens

Installation and connection of camera

Camera type: Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0

Lens: Nikon Nikkor AF 35-70 mm    |   f number range:  3.3 - 4.5

Excerpt from Elog (http://physics-elog.slac.stanford.edu/facetelog/show.jsp?dir=/2024/19/08.05&pos=2024-05-08T17:31:12)



LYSO screens

The tracking layers are two pixellated scintillating LYSO screens from Advatech (UK), provided by Jena.

Coating is BaSO4

Crystal dimensions: 2 mm x 2 mm x 4 mm

Screen dimensions: 50 mm (width) x 200 mm (height)

Test fitting in tunnel

Fig 1: Test fit of mirrors and frame holders without screens.


Tunnel installation

Manta G895-B with 50 mm lens (f 0.95), imaging both screens using 3 plane mirrors.

2 LYSO screens on one chip (camera sideways), screens are mirrored relative to each other.

EPICS

Manta G895B supported as of Nov 2021.

Found like other cameras under Main screen → Matlab GUIs → Profile monitors → PDC_SCREEN

Figure 2: New field of view using Manta G895-B (this is slightly zoomed in) and light from beam losses in Nov 2021.


Fig 3: Full field of view.

The field of view is larger than needed because we must have been zoomed in during setup.

Might correct this in a future access.

Plans for silicon tracking layers

We are considering silicon tracking layers as replacement for the scintillating screens.

The energy deposition in the silicon layers would be lower, but the collection efficiency (since direct detection) would balance this out.


Chris has a few ePix10k that could be modified for operation at FACET-II.

https://lcls.slac.stanford.edu/detectors/ePix10k

Contact: Chris Kenney (kenney@slac.stanford.edu)


Required infrastructure:

  • HV power supply
  • Water cooling (chiller overground)
  • Signal cables
  • Trigger (TTL is okay)



  • No labels