Table of Contents
Systems Engineering Timeline
Date | Event | Status | Responsible | Comments/Issues | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thur, Jul 30th | Requirement Slide Template for L2's | Kurita, Lawrence | Create a first cut for the L2s - create template slide after Friday flowdown call (Kurita) Add column in risk registry to identify "Key Driving" requirements. Have L2's and Charles pick up to 10 Send this to project on Friday after flowdown call reviews | ||
Fri, Jul 31 | Send Requirement Slide Template for L2's | Kurita, Lawrence | Review with flowdown group and send to project | ||
Mon, Aug 3 | SE & Risk Slides for PD | Kurita, Akerib | SE summary slides; Risk Slides for PD and L2s, DRM meeting being scheduled | ||
Tue, Aug 4 | Requirement Slides for L2s | Kurita, Guarino, Besuner | Create a first cut for the L2s - create template slide after Friday flowdown call (Kurita) | ||
on-going | PBD verification | Kurita, Lawrence | Charles, Nadine - Meeting being scheduled with detector group and J. Ruhl. Currently the PBD has not been validated by sims and is on-going. | ||
Tue, Aug 4 | Risk Slides for L2s | Kurita, Akerib | Option 1: Show top risks (maybe 5 or 7) with current assessment and "if mitigated" assessment. Since we don't have time to determine the appropriate risk strategy and what the project wants to fund to lower their risks, we can show them the process and the fact that we believe we can bring this project in successfully. Option 2: Consider eliminating risk slides (most of the SE team did not think this was a good approach) | ||
Tue, Aug 4 | ICD slides | Grudzinski, Besuner | Bobby to designate each ICD with a maturity rating something like "outline-only" "most parameters identified not quantified" "many parameters quantified" or something along those lines (maybe just by numbers, less than one). Then remove reviewer permissions on the less-mature ones and provide links in review presentations to more mature ones. Analogous to the spotlight cost/schedule presentations on some of the more mature elements of the project. Update to the block diagram for site (Wait until after review) | ||
Tue, Aug 4 | Plenary Dry Run | SE to provide slides to management; requirements and risks | |||
Thu, Aug 6 | Breakout Dry Runs | Kurita, Besuner | Minor updates. Will start with the Deliverable slides leading the reviewers to our "key" docs that are ready for review. Do we need another dry run? | ||
Fri, Aug 7 | Post Plenary Talks | SE to provide risk updates for Jim's talk. Anything else? | |||
Fri, Aug 7 | Post Breakout Talks | Kurita | |||
Tue, Aug 11 (TBD) | Review Support Documents Posted | see CD-1 Deliverables | |||
Tue, Aug 4 | Key Deliverables Posted | SEMP, RMP, Risk Registry | |||
Tue, Aug 11 | Supporting Docs | Add response to recommendations | |||
Tue, Aug 18 | Review Starts |
Link to Talks
SE PD Slides - need to create
Deliverables: See CD-1 deliverables