Table of Contents
Input Examples
A complete example for a lossless cavity
ModelInfo: {
File: dds3.ncdf //mesh file. It is the file converted using acdtool
BoundaryCondition: { //specify boundary conditions. The numbers here are sideset in cubit
Magnetic: 1, 2 //reference surfaces 1 and 2 are symmetric planes
Electric: 3 4 //set reference surfaces 3 and 4 to be electric boundary condition
Exterior: 6 //surface group 6 (maybe many surfaces) is metal
}
SurfaceMaterial: { //for each metal (exterior) surface group, list the sigma values
ReferenceNumber: 6
Sigma: 5.8e7
}
}
FiniteElement: {
Order: 2 //set the finite element basis function order to be used.
CurvedSurfaces: on
}
EigenSolver: {
NumEigenvalues: 1 //want to compute 1 mode
FrequencyShift: 10.e9 //the eigenfrequency of the mode should be above 10GHz
}
CheckPoint: {
Action: save
Directory: eigens //eigenvectors are saved out into this directory
}
PostProcess: {
Toggle: off //postprocess switch
ModeFile: dds //The prefix of the mode filename.
}
Log: thisrun.log //If you want more printout logged into the file
Once Omega3P run is successfully completed, eignvectors are stored in subdirectory <tt>eigens</tt>. User can convert them to mode files to be visualized using paraview. The following is the command to do that:
acdtool postprocess eigentomode eigens
A complete example about a cavity with lossy materials
ModelInfo: {
File: ./pillbox.ncdf
BoundaryCondition: {
Electric: 1,2,3,4
Exterior: 6
}
Material : {
Attribute: 1
Epsilon: 1.0
Mu: 1.0
}
Material : {
Attribute: 2
Epsilon: 1.0
Mu: 1.0
EpsilonImag: -0.2 //lossy material
}
}
FiniteElement: {
Order: 1
Curved Surfaces: off
}
PostProcess: {
Toggle: off
ModeFile: mode
SymmetryFactor: 2
}
EigenSolver: {
NumEigenvalues: 2
FrequencyShift: 5e9
}
A complete example with periodic boundary conditions
ModelInfo: {
File: c026ds-pbc.ncdf
BoundaryCondition: {
Magnetic: 1 2
Periodic_M: 3 //master surface
Periodic_S: 4 //slave surface, the mesh should be exactly same as those on the master surface
Exterior: 6
Theta: -150 //phase
}
}
FiniteElement: {
Order: 2
CurvedSurfaces: on
ScalarPotential: 1 //use A-V formulation
}
PostProcess:
{
Toggle: on
ModeFile: mode
SymmetryFactor: 8.
}
EigenSolver: {
NumEigenvalues: 1
FrequencyShift: 10e9
}
A complete example with waveguide loaded cavity
ModelInfo: {
File: cell1fourth.ncdf
BoundaryCondition: {
Magnetic: 1,2,3,4
Exterior: 6
Waveguide: 7 //for each number appeared here, it should have at least one Port container later. Absorbing and Waveguide have the same effects. Omega3P internally will figure out which BC to use.
}
}
FiniteElement: {
Order: 1
Curved Surfaces: on
}
PostProcess: {
Toggle: on
ModeFile: test
}
EigenSolver: {
NumEigenvalues: 1
FrequencyShift: 9.e9
}
CheckPoint: {
Action: save
Directory: eigens
}
Port: {
ReferenceNumber: 7 //this number should match surface groups in waveguide boundary condition.
Origin: 0.0, 0.0415, 0.0 //the origin of the 2D port in the 3D coordinate system
XDirection: 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 //the x axis of the 2D port in the 3D coordinate system
YDirection: 0.0, 0.0, -1.0 //the y axis of the 2D port in the 3D coordinate system
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic //analytic expression is used
Mode: {
WaveguideType: Rectangular //it is a rectangular waveguide
ModeType: TE 1 0 //load the TE10 mode
A: 0.028499 //dimension of the waveguide in x
B: 0.0134053 //dimension of the waveguide in y
}
}
}
Load TEM mode in a coax waveguide
Port: {
ReferenceNumber: 2
Origin: 0.0, 0.0, 0.011
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic
Mode: {
WaveguideType: Coax
ModeType: TEM
A: 0.0011 //smaller radius
B: 0.0033 //larger radius
}
}
}
Load TE11 mode in a circular waveguide
Port: {
ReferenceNumber: 2
Origin: 0.0, 0.0, 0.1
XDirection: 1.0, 0.0, 0.0
YDirection: 0.0, 1.0, 0.0
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic
Mode: {
Waveguide type: Circular
Mode type: TE 1 1
A: 0.03
}
}
}
Load two TE modes in the same rectangular waveguide
Port: {
Reference number: 9 // FPC
Origin: 0.0, 0.198907, -0.4479152585
XDirection: -1.0, 0.0, 0.0
YDirection: 0.0, 0.0, 1.0
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic
Mode: {
WaveguideType: Rectangular
ModeType: TE 1 1
A: 0.1348935946
B: 0.024973714999999970
}
}
}
Port: {
Reference number: 9 // FPC
Origin: 0.0, 0.198907, -0.4479152585
XDirection: -1.0, 0.0, 0.0
YDirection: 0.0, 0.0, 1.0
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic
Mode: {
WaveguideType: Rectangular
ModeType: TE 2 0
A: 0.1348935946
B: 0.024973714999999970
}
}
}
Make a non-planar surface absorbing boundary
Port: {
ReferenceNumber: 5 //reference surface ID
Origin: 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 //not used
XDirection: 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 //not used
YDirection: 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 //not used
ESolver: {
Type: Analytic
Mode:{
Mode number: 1
Waveguide type: ABC
Mode type: ABC
}
}
}
LinearSolver options in EigenSolver container
- The first option is that user does not provide anything. The EigenSolver container in the input file looks like:
In this case, Omega3P will use the default option for linear solver for solving shifted linear systems
EigenSolver: { NumEigenvalues: 1 FrequencyShift: 10.e9 Tolerance: 1.e-8 }
- The second option is to use float version of the sparse direct solver.
EigenSolver: { NumEigenvalues: 1 FrequencyShift: 10.e9 Preconditioner: MUMPSFLOAT //use the float version. memory usage reduced into half. }
- The third option is to use Krylov subspace method with different preconditioner.
The code will choose either CG (real matrices) or GMRES (complex matrices) and the p-version
EigenSolver: { NumEigenvalues: 1 FrequencyShift: 10.e9 Preconditioner: MP //this use p-version of multilevel preconditioner. }
of multilevel precondtioner as the solver for shifted linear systems.
- The fourth option is to use out-of-core sparse direct solver (an experimental feature).
EigenSolver: { NumEigenvalues: 1 FrequencyShift: 10.e9 Memory: 1000 //if the memory usage of the matrix factor in any process is larger than 1000MBytes, //switch to use out-of-core solver. }
FAQ
How to calculate Wallloss Quality Factor?
There are two ways to do so. Each way has its advantage and disadvantage.
- Inside ModelInfo.BoundaryCondition define a set of boundary surfaces as Exterior.
For each of the boundary surfaces, have a corresponding SurfaceMaterial container inside ModelInfo.
For example:After that, make sure you toggle the PostProcess on.ModelInfo: { File: .dds3.ncdf BoundaryCondition: { Magnetic: 1, 2, 3, 4 Exterior: 6 // sideset 6 is defined as Exterior BC. } SurfaceMaterial: { // have a separate for each number in Exterior BC ReferenceNumber: 6 //the corresponding sideset in Exterior BC Sigma: 5.8e7 //electrical conductivity of the material } }After you run omega3p with the input file, you will get a file called "output" under the same directory. Inside the file, it has a summary of results such as:PostProcess: { Toggle: on // this should be on for computing wallloss Q ModeFile: ./dds }The number after QualityFactor is the one you are looking for. This method uses perturbation theory and has advantage that it is very simple. The computation associated with it is minimal.Mode : { TotalEnergy : 4.4270939088102e-12 QualityFactor : 6478.5096350252 File : ./dds.l0.1.144469E+10.m0 PowerLoss : 4.9139118623939e-05 Frequency : 11444685657.626 } - Inside ModelInfo.BoundaryCondition, define the set of surfaces as Impedance (instead of Exterior in method 1).
Set the HFormulation to be 1 (this is very important). Also, have a set of corresponding SurfaceMaterials inside ModelInfo as those in method 1. For example:After you run omega3p with the input, in the output file, you will seeModelInfo: { File: dds3.ncdf BoundaryCondition: { HFormulation: 1 Magnetic: 1, 2, 3, 4 Impedance: 6 } SurfaceMaterial: { ReferenceNumber: 6 Sigma: 5.8e7 } }The number after ExternalQ is the wall loss Q you are looking for. During the omega3p run, it should also print out the Q information such asMode = { TotalEnergy = { 6.2827077634198e-07, 0 }, ExternalQ = 6579.1486638005, QualityFactor = inf, File = './dds.l0.R1.144619E+10I8.698837E+05.m0', PowerLoss = 0, Frequency = { 11446188331.641, 869883.69746227 } }Note that this method set an impedance boundary condition on those surfaces and make the eigenvalue problem complex and nonlinear. It takes more time and memory to solve the problem. But the field will be in the right phase (even close to the boundary surfaces).COMMIT MODE: 0 FREQ = (11446188331.64141,869883.6974622669) k = (239.8943683519209,0.01823141417003215) Q = 6579.148663800495
Both methods should give you converged Q results if mesh is dense enough.