Mitigating the Woes of Developing and Releasing GlastRelease

Burning Issues

External Libraries

Unit test Failures

"Pointer" Skims

Dependencies and our use of CMT (Toby)

Environment variables (Toby)

Our use of CMT leaves a very heavy footprint for executables, which is a big strike against it. We are using it in a default mode in which it forces the definition of two variables for each package, namely <package>ROOT and <package>CONFIG. We never use the latter, but sometimes need the former.  An example is the package Gleam: running the setup to define all the environment variables adds 255 variables!

This is easy to turn off, but any such assumption then needs an alternative environment variable, most often to find the root of the package. Having this explicit in the requirements file makes this public, a plus. This has been done for FluxSvc.

Test Programs (Toby)

We started a project to define test programs as sub-packages, allowing the dependencies to be factored. (A fix for much of the dependency problem mentionsed above.) This was done for FluxSvc, with a simple convention: if a package had a subpackage named "test_<package>", then that defined a test program for the package. Such a package does not show up with a CMT "show packages" command, but it is easy to check for the existence of, say, test_FluxSvc/cmt/requirements, then, when cd'ing to that folder, CMT recognizes the package. This is supported by MRvcmt, and apparently by the RM only on Windows. This ball was dropped, needs to be put back in play.

 MRStudio (Joanne)

 The design of MRStudio (gui layered on the core functionality) means that there can be much more commonality in the way RM does its builds and the way developers do, easing the burden of maintaining separate code to do essentially the same thing and making RM a more useful tool for debugging build problems on "the other" platform.  This project deserves high priority.

Shared Libraries for Utility Packages (Joanne)

Currently facilities and detModel are built as static libraries rather than shared (it can't be a Gaudi-style component shareable of course, but it could be linked shared, similar to xmlBase and other packages).  facilities is used by many (perhaps most) other packages.  We are forgoing the benefits of a shareable (faster linking, less duplication of binaries, easier to propagate facilities bug fixes or improvements to all packages using it) for no reason that I am aware of.  For detModel, used only by GlastSvc and the diagnostic package detCheck, the benefits are not as great, but the principle is the same. This is not a critical need, but it is an annoyance and there is some overhead involved in maintaining two branches of facilities (the main one building a static library for Gleam and ScienceTools; the other building a shareable for use in the Online environment).