Minutes for SLAC-SEECS Meeting January 18th, 2012.

General

Ghulam has an SID. Sadia has submitted his computer account form - Sadia

IPV6 - Anjum and Ghulam (this has been de-prioritized until new database PingER is working)

IPV6 machine is working fine. Ghulam installed pinger2 on it and tried to collect data. But it was unable to resolve the IPV6 address. Seems like we need to do some changes in the whole architecture to make it workable with IPV6. Les looked at pinger2.pl, it verifies the address is IPv4 4 octets. He made a suggestion to use valid_ip.pl to verify both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses. Ghulam are there other parts of pinger2.pl that need modifiying. It already can access ping6. In addition one will need a copy of pinger.xml with IPv6 hosts and their addresses.

A possible project would be to make traceroute.pl work on a dual stack IPv6 host (say to traceroute to ipv6.google.com). Will need to look at gethostbyname etc. Is there any interest?

Another is to make pingtable.pl and getdata.pl IPV6 capable, again this could use valid_ip.pl. Since Ghulam is working on these it would be good for him to add this.

pinger2.pl

There is a bug in pinger2.pl that results in the <BeaconList> being empty. Les has made a fix that may help.  Sadia has created a new tar file /afs/slac/g/www/www-iepm/pinger/tools/pingER-2.0.3.tar.gz. It has been sent to Joun who is currently installing pinger2.pl on various machines. He said that its working fine right now but require more days to be sure of its working .

Traceroute Archive - Sadia

It is now in production.  Try it, suggest improvements.

ICFA Report - Les and Amber

HEC Report - Anjum and Amber

HEC report will have three sections:

  1. POP to POP Analysis: This will further have two parts
    1. Inter-Regional POP to POP analysis: This will include analysis from ISL FJWU POP to all the POPs in different regions of Pakistan.
    2. Intra-Regional POP to POP analysis: This will include POP to POP performance within a region. Only three regions have more than one POP nodes, Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad. Analysis will be carried out for these regions only.
  2. PoP to Non POP Analysis: This will include two parts
    1. Inter Regional POP to Non POP Analysis: A POP node in each of the 5 regions will be chosen and the analysis from these POP nodes to all the Non POP nodes of other regions will be carried out.
    2. Intra-Regional POP to Non POP Analysis: A POP node in each of the 5 regions will be chosen and the analysis from these POP nodes to their own regions will be carried out.
  3. Outliers: This section will include some interesting POP to POP and PoP to Non POP outliers with their behavior analyzation using traceroutes.

PingER Explorer - Amber

Status of Pakistani PingER hosts - Amber

  1. There is a discrepancy between the PERN monitors reported by Joun as not working and those SLAC is able to gather data from (reported in checkdata, here). It was reported a couple of weeks ago. Kashif were Joun are looking at. For example we are unable to gather data from pinger.pern.edu.pk, there is something strange with the wget not working (see here). This maybe tied to some improvements to security installed on Dec 14th. Les confirmed there are still problems affecting 4 PERN POP nodes and 12 other Pakistani monitors. See Hosts pingable from some regions but not others for more details.
    1. Currently pinger.pern.edu.pk is not pingable so we are unable to test further. Progress
    2. All nodes deployed at PERN PoPs are being upgraded to enhance security. Anjum had discussed with Umar as to what security features should be implemented on these nodes. 
  2. In addition some PERN POP monitoring hosts (pingerisl-fjwu.pern.edu.pk, pingerisl-qau.pern.edu.pk, nuisb.seecs.edu.pk, nukhimain.seecs.edu.pk and pinger.pern.edu.pk ) are only pingable from Pakistan and Jordan. This may or may not be related. This needs to be resolved.  Using reflector.pl to ping nukhimain.seecs.edu.pk and also www.cern.ch, the number of landmarks able to ping nukhiman was 26, while for cern it was 106. It appears only landmarks in Pakistan, Algeria, India, Brazil, and Russia can ping nukhimain. Kashif and Joun are looking at. Progress
  3. Kashif reports we need a system for air university because they have a shortage of systems. 

As updated on 01/18/2011.

Responsible person: Joun Muhammad

HEC is sending out letters to the contact persons (who are non-cooperative) after which the nodes will be more reliable. 2-3 weeks will show much more stable nodes.

Node

Status

Description

pinger.ustb.edu.pk         

UP         

Pinging by another IP. Data not collected. Issue will be resolved soon.          

pinger.giki.edu.pk         

Down         

Off because of network issues.      

hu.seecs.edu.pk         

Down      

Pinging but not fetching data. Trouble shooting in progress.       

pinger.uaar.edu.pk

Down

Network issue, will be up soon.         

airuniversity.seecs.edu.pk

Down

System issue, will be up soon.    

Joun is looking at archiving the reports where we can get at them if we need to mine them.

Send an email to Joun asking why cant we ping mentioned nodes. Its probably not a SLAC problem, we need to look into them in further detail. We are also unable to ping them from other countries. This problem needs to be explored.

PingER Archive Site - Ghulam

Ghulam has rebuilt the database.

After all  the discussion, it is decided to try the database scheme for any previous one month data to see the further steps required for sharding and managing the data.As PerfSonar has some fields which are not measured/needed by pingER, they can be left NULL. PerfSonar libraries will take that a NULL. The  fields which are required by pingER but not  applicable in PerfSonar, will be added in table. PerfSonar libraries will ignore these new added columns.

Current Schema :

There will be three tables(just like Seecs schema)

  1. host table: will have PerfSonar host table fields and location_location fields (only which are required by PingER) plus pingER required feilds.
  2. data table will be the same as new proposed one.However packet recieved/sent if used by pingER packet loss calculation or in anywhere can be added in data table.(Sadia believes there might be some PerfSonar library which will deal with it. She will see and tell Ghulam if there exist any)
  3. Add "by-class" field as required by pingER in metadata table.

2.Raw data for one month will be dumped into database and aggregation will done only for monthly data( which means one extra table for selected month for time being)

Ghulam: 

  1. Build database based on new schema(Send it to Sadia as well so same database can be built at SLAC)
  2. Modify getdata.pl(fine if its without parallel loops or threads as long a sit takes less than 5-6hours
  3. Run and test the getdata.pl
  4. Test it with queries as if one gives from pingtable.pl html page and measure the performance

Sadia 

  1. Modify getdata.pl to shift data from flat files to database

Future concerns:(Will be considered once  the performance of above monthly aggregated data is observed)

1.How to store raw data for one year

2.How should it be sharded

3.For how long data should be in database

Sadia :Adding max RTT and Alpha to pingtable.pl and the analyze scripts 

TULIP - Bilal

Following table lists the targets in Europe which are not plotted on maps. For example the first target can be explored here . This can be compared to a target which can be plotted on the map. Bilal looked into it and found that nodes are plotted using other GeoIP and IP tracking tools. 

Country Name

IP Address

Progress

Austria

62.218.39.47

1/10/2012: Fails due to an unreachable host in Germany 212.201.44.81

Austria

212.33.36.188

1/10/2012: Fails due to an unreachable host in Germany 212.201.44.81

Italy

193.206.84.12

1/10/2012: Can be plotted successfully

Ukraine

193.29.220.3

1/10/2012: Can be plotted successfully

Amber looked at the host 212.201.44.81 (in Germany) in Pinger and Tulip database to find out why this host is unreachable. We do not have this host in Pinger Database, however, in Tulip database we only have one information about this host which is its IP. Amber and Les decided to delete this host from Tulip database. Bilal has to rerun the script to find out if Austria still gets plotted or not. 

Deleting the unreachable host is a temporary solution. We still need to find out a permanent solution for plotting a landmark whose one of the nearest host is not working; Tulip should consider the other nearest landmark to plot it.

One is to change the appolonius code, and the other is to give up on appollonius as we have already proved that Appollonius is useless.

Bilal:

  1. Remove apollonius
CBG TULIP Integration -- FYP (Bilal)

PerfSONAR (Pakistan)

Possible projects

Future meeting time - Les

  1. Next meeting on Wednesday 18th January, 2012 at 8:00 pm in US and Thursday 19th January, 2012 at 9:00am in Pakistan.