Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

There are some interesting results from the Japanese earthquake of March 11th 2011. Accordingto http://www.renesys.com/blog/2011/03/japan-quake.shtml the big (8.9) one was Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC.h3

53cottrell@pinger:~>ping www.tohoku.ac.jp
ping: unknown host www.tohoku.ac.jp
Exit 2

Code Block

53cottrell@pinger:~>ping www.tohoku.ac.jp
ping: unknown host www.tohoku.ac.jpExit 2

Also though www.

PingER results

None of the 6 hosts that PingER monitors in Japan went down for an extended period of time (although right now I cannot ping www.kek.jp). Also we do not monitor a Japanese host near the epicenter. Tohoku University (www.tohoku.ac.jp), which were not monitoring previously, on the outskirts of Sendai was not responding on 3/12/2011 12:46pm PST. 

60cottrell@pinger:~>ping www.jp.kek

...

From 134.79.252.133 icmp_seq=114 Destination Host Unreachable


--- 130.87.104.107 ping statistics ---

121 packets transmitted, 0 received, +4 errors, 100% packet loss, time 119996ms

, pipe 2

Exit 1

Japanese hosts seen From SLAC

# 1. Looking from SLAC there are big increases in the avg RTT and min RTT for some Japanese sites (but not all)
      According to http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0001xgp/  the big (8.9) one was Friday, March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 Image Added

RIKEN seen from the world

# UTC
2. Looking at RIKEN (a monitoring mode and so easy to select on and also one of the most affected as seen from SLAC) seen from the world looking at avg RTT and min RTTwe RTT we see:

      a. ## No effect seen from Africa, E. Asia, Europe, L. America, M. East

      b. ## Big effect from N. America (Canada 163ms=>264ms, US 120ms=>280ms)

      c. ## India CDAC Mumbia no effect, Pune 380ms=> 460ms, VSNL Mumbia 360ms=>400ms

      d. ## Sri Lanka no effect

d. ## Pakistan (we have lots of monitors so should be interesting).

            i. ### NIIT sees no effect (nb not on PERN)

            ii. ### The PERN nodes starting with 111. (apart from UAAR see later) see 420ms=>500ms

            iii. ### The PERN nodes starting with 121. See no effect
            iv. I am suspicious of UAAR since every other Pakistan node has 400+ms to RIKEN whereas UAAR has 190ms. Someone should look at this.

           

Conclusion It is not the site RIKEN that has gone bad, rather it is some of the routes
3.
Japanese hosts seen from JP.RIKEN.N3 (RIKEN) see no impact on RTT

      It looks the route to Japan not Japan itself. I wonder if the undersea earthquake has disrupted some  cables?

Routes

Comparing the routes (see below) from SLAC of RIKEN (ping.riken.jp) and NET.APAN.N2 (ns.jp.apan.net) we see RIKEN has more hops and goes Eastwards via the Avenue of the Americas in NY, while APAN goes directly via Sunnyvale near SLAC and then via Pacific Wave directly to Japan. OSAKA and U-TOKYO  are similar to RIKEN.  See below


...

Does someone want to put together a case study? I have to do my taxes!


Traceroutes

===========

53cottrell@pinger:~>traceroute ping.riken.jp 200

traceroute to snoopy.riken.go.jp (134.160.4.17), 30 hops max, 200 byte packets

1  rtr-servcore1-serv01-iepm (134.79.104.66)  0.326 ms  0.260 ms  0.235 ms

2  rtr-core2-p2p-servcore1 (134.79.252.162)  0.355 ms  0.272 ms  0.261 ms

3  rtr-border2-p2p-core2 (134.79.252.145)  0.536 ms  0.359 ms  0.330 ms

4  slac-mr2-p2p-rtr-border2 (192.68.191.249)  0.250 ms  0.229 ms  0.237 ms

5  sunnsdn2-ip-slacmr2.es.net (134.55.217.2)  0.629 ms  0.649 ms  0.632 ms

6  sunncr1-sunnsdn2.es.net (134.55.209.98)  0.778 ms  0.739 ms  0.712 ms

7  denvcr2-sunncr1.es.net (134.55.220.49)  28.295 ms  27.861 ms  27.889 ms

     MPLS Label=321392 CoS=6 TTL=1 S=0

8  kanscr1-ip-denvcr2.es.net (134.55.209.46)  41.048 ms  40.982 ms  41.033 ms

     MPLS Label=357088 CoS=6 TTL=1 S=0

9  chiccr1-ip-kanscr1.es.net (134.55.221.58)  51.719 ms  51.627 ms  51.637 ms

     MPLS Label=302528 CoS=6 TTL=1 S=0

10  clevcr1-ip-chiccr1.es.net (134.55.217.53)  60.673 ms  60.652 ms  60.673 ms

     MPLS Label=366704 CoS=6 TTL=1 S= 0

11  bostcr1-ip-clevcr1.es.net (134.55.41.146)  73.838 ms  73.778 ms  73.818 ms

     MPLS Label=363424 CoS=6 TTL=1 S=0

12  aofacr2-ip-bostcr1.es.net (134.55.41.122)  78.534 ms  78.530 ms  78.535 ms

     MPLS Label=300768 CoS=6 TTL=1 S=0

13  aofasdn1-ip-aofacr2.es.net (134.55.38.50)  83.867 ms  78.413 ms  78.403 ms

14  198.124.216.154 (198.124.216.154)  79.404 ms  78.533 ms  78.537 ms

15  tokyo1-dc-RM-P-2-3-0-11.sinet.ad.jp (150.99.203.57)  270.323 ms  270.283 ms  270.250 ms

16  * * *

17  riken-LAN.gw.sinet.ad.jp (150.99.192.170)  277.472 ms  277.412 ms  277.447 ms

18  134.160.6.2 (134.160.6.2)  277.686 ms  277.544 ms  277.833 ms

19  snoopy.riken.go.jp (134.160.4.17)  277.362 ms !<10>  277.415 ms !<10>  277.415 ms !<10>


55cottrell@pinger:~>traceroute ns.jp.apan.net

...