...
- Dr. Anjum is verifying that table.pl at SEECS has all the known Pakistani monitors. Need to study improvements with pingtable.pl time series and the smokeping plots where we have them. If something has been recommended by our measurements and that has happened and made things better that is very important for the case study.
- UET, LSE, COMSATS do not have the full set of Pakistani beacons. See matrix. The Pakistani monitoring nodes are supposed to get the beacon list from SEECS. – Anjum said he has a student who can fix but need password so they can fix the nodes so they get the list from the SEECS server. They are fetching their beacons from SLAC. Anjum is requesting admins to fix. Working on it, but response from admins is not good.
- We need to understand the high ping losses for UAAR. Sadia please put together a case study. Zafar discussed with Sadia and she has started something and it will go in the HEC report. It seems to have cleared up in November.
- 111.68.102.40 = PK.LSE.EDU.N3 needs to have a name registered in DNS.
- UETAXILA pings, but the web page at uetaxila for traceroute does not respond, the ping_data.pl web form responds. Has the traceroute.pl been installed it does not appear to be working. Les fixed a problem in table.pl which was not counting nodes which only have an IP address.Contact person replaced pinger.xml for ping_data.pl problem 12/6/2010 however its is still missing the <BeaconList> section of beacon hosts.
- UOB is working 12/2/2010. Has the traceroute been added to the TULIP landmarks?
- NWFPUET ping-data.pl form is installed and getting data. However http://pinger.nwfpuet.edu.pk/cgi-bin/traceroute.pl?function=ping does not work, works
Sadia and Amber are working on the Peshawar data. Some of Peshawar node show long RTT to other sites and others have short RTT. Some are going via Karachi. HEC Peshawar: pinger-rcp.pern.edu.pk. Same status as conveyed earlier, contact person and administration there need formal approval from DG IT HEC Islamabad
...