Versions Compared

Old Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Les Cottrell

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Les Cottrell

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

  1. What is the state of laundering, there was a statement that there were no landmarks.  It appears that PingER and perfSONAR are OK but PlanetLabs has no landmarks.
  2. Wiki Markup{*}_\[Pending - Zafar\]_{*} Should add ability (to reflector.cgi) to ignore landmarks which are within a specified “short” distance of one that has already been used. Mark such landmarks as "dups". Work on this is subject to access to reflector.
  3. Big problem with integrated version of Apollonius and Tri-Lateration not working in TULIP Live - Faisal
    1. Integrated Code doesn't work with Reflector at SLAC
    2. Trilateration doesn't give correct estimates in integrated code. We are giving up on Trilateration and will focus on CBG via MatLab server.

...

  1. Live GUI:
    1. Needs refactorization.
    2. Wiki Markup{*}_\[Pending - Faisal\]_{*} Adding other geolocation estimates to GeoIPTools (GeoTools, IPLocationTools, whois, shortest ping ...) to come. Some things are ready to be installed  when the trilateration & apollonius work.

...

  1. We still don't believe in TULIP trilateration results. We will give upon it.unmigrated-wiki-markup
  2. {*}_\[Pending - Umar\]_{*} SVN for paper, Umar has set it up and it is working, Umar will send out the accounts.
  3. Where do we go from here, do we await INFOCOM comments?
    • Do we rewrite with a new story, rewrite the introduction explaining what we are trying to sell, focus on comparative analysis, global extension, dependence on landmarks, tool. Put together a bulleted points of what the story line is. Umar, Fida, Zafar, Les will put together story line bullets. For the next meeting in a week. We need to identify where it is being submitted to determine what to focus on. Two possible venues are PAM (paper Oct 9, abstract Oct 2nd) and IMC-- Umar is looking at. Struggling whether to focus on Apollonius or comparative analysis. He is comfortable with Zafar's storyline. Fida will put together a paragraph on financial side for the motivation.
  4. Wiki Markup{*}_\[Pending - Fida and Umar\]_{*} Do we go with comparative analysis, if we do then do we include Apollonius, if we do how we include it. Need to identify where we are useful. Mobility scenarios: mobility, routers, database does not have up to date info, e.g. mobile nodes moving country to country, do well if target is close to a landmark.
  5. Need to identity other papers to quote how the 5 parameters we use affect the result,
    • How much time can Umar spend on it?
    • Fall semester starts Monday so Umar cannot drive.
    • Need a person to drive the paper, in particular the first few pages with the storyline.
    • Ideally the person to re-write is Fida, he wants to do it, but with 3 courses and assignments but cannot be the driving force. Can Zafar take the reins. Zafar is volunteering to re-write the story line. Made a few changes to the Introduction part last week. Added a few lines about infrastructure. Feedback and guidelines required. Fida and Zafar are prepared to respond to comments/questions in 24-48 hours.
    • 1st step put together a story line in Google wave.

...

  1. Les is working with SLAC HR on formal way of categorizing interns.

    Future meeting time - Les

8pm Thursday 14th October will be the next formal meeting.