Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

outputdistance.xlsx

Created by Zafar Gilani, sent by email 6/11/2010. It compares Tri-lateration (3 landmarks) with mulitlateration (<=5 landmarks) giving the target IP address, its actual location, the targets estimated location, landmark lat/longs and error between estimated and actual

acuumulated_results.xlsx

Created by Fida, sent by email 6/10/2010. It is a compendium comparing the several of the  geolocation methods including:CBG, SOI, TBG, TBG_Updtaed, Apollonius, Triilateration

cbg_tri_lateration_vs_new_tri_lateration.xlsx

 

File Sent by Zafar 3.08pm Jun 1 2010. Compares improved trilateration vs CBG trilateration. - There are a total of 174 targets for CBG out of which 131 are those which ignore values that are either "0<error<1" or "NaN". 
-Only 74 targets are ones that overlap between CBG tri-lateration and improved tri-lateration.
-If I don't ignore CBG's values that have estimate error in the range "0<error<1" then CBG performs 64/74 times better and tri-lateration performs only 10/74 times better.
- But even if I ignore values with error estimate "0<error<1" then CBG performs 32/74 times better, improved tri-lateration performs 10/74 times better and rest are unaccounted

m_vs_t_rtt_new.xlsx