Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

VersionDateSteering FileDetectorProfileBenchmarkComment
Pass12015/8/1EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1

EvioToLcio: http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_EvioToLcio.xml  
Pass12015/8/1EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1

doProcess: http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_doProcess.xml0.11704 sec/event 
r33932015/8/25EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1

doProcess: http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_doProcess_2015_08_24a.xml0.06899 sec/eventSho fixed leftover debugging code in tracking
r35572015/9/9

EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1

 0.0697 sec/event 
r35572015/9/9

EngineeringRun2015FullRecon_Pass2.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v1

 0.1117 sec/eventExtra tracking strategies.
r35572015/9/9EngineeringRun2015FullRecon_Pass2.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v3-fieldmap

 0.1183 sec/eventFieldmap added, new geometry.
r37402015/9/30

EngineeringRun2015FullRecon_Pass2.lcsim

HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v3-fieldmap

doProcess: http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_doProcess_2015_08_24a.xml0.1321 sec/event 
r39152015/10/31EngineeringRun2015FullRecon.lcsimHPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v3-fieldmap

http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_doProcess_r3915_2015_10_31.xml

http://nuclear.unh.edu/HPS/Profiles/Call_Tree_doProcess_r3915_2015_11_02_dynamic.xml

 The two different files were profiled with different methods.
The first one by "sampling", the second one "dynamically", by automatically inserting marker code into the Java for each method.
Sampling is supposed to give a more accurate reflection of the fraction of time spend in a particular method. Dynamic gives the call counts and will include every method, even those that completed quickly. 

Benchmark performed on the first 10,000 events of run 5772 (file 0), on a 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7 laptop.

...