Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Christopher O'Grady

Saved on

compared with

New Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Christopher O'Grady

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • For single bunch: As low as possible while still removing the noise (i.e.) not getting noise current profiles.
  • For double bunch: As low as possible while separating the two bunches. Call the 'ProcessedXTCAVImage' method again, and look at the size of axis 0: this will be the number of bunches detected. You can probably write a program to automatize the determination of this parameter, until you get lets say a 95% of two bunch detection.

120Hz Operation

(Thought from Tim Maxwell on 2/2/2015, discouraging this mode of operation)

This was an option. However it restricts the vertical energy ROI. For soft xrays it would easily and frequently clip the image of the beam as well as require very careful ROI management, and so may have compromised random images for your data.

Another largely untested option are other running conditions recently found. This appears to delay tagging of all images by one event (3 fiducials). However, we are absolutely not certain this behavior is consistent and therefore don't recommend it for critical data.