Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

PASS8

SIG

BKG

RibbonVeto_p8

99.5% (99.5%)

89.9% (89.9%)

CornerVeto_p8

98.6% (99.1%)

86.9% (96.6%)

Tkr1SigmaVeto_p8

93.3% (94.7%)

22.5% (25.9%)

TkrSigmaHitVeto_p8

88.7% (95%)

16.6% (73.7%)

Tkr1ConeVeto_p8

83.7% (94.3%)

10.5% (63.6%)

Cal1ConeVeto_p8

81.7% (97.6%)

4.96% (47.1%)

Wiki Markup
{htmlcommentHTMLcomment:hidden}
|| OLD PASS8 || SIG || BKG ||
| VetoHit1Cut_p8 | 95.12% (95.12%) -- 58105 | 26.2% (26.2%) -- 14802 |
| TotalTileEnergyCut_p8 | 86.53% (90.96%) -- 52855 | 12.83% (48.99%) -- 7251 |
| VetoGap1Cut_p8 | 86.36% (99.8%) -- 52750 | 12.65% (98.52%) -- 7144 |
| VetoHitCut_p8 | 85.53% (99.05%) -- 52247 | 12.06% (95.34%) -- 6811 |
| Cal1ConeCut_p8 | 82.85% (96.86%) -- 50609 | 5.245% (43.5%) -- 2963 |
{htmlcommentHTMLcomment}

The power of the Cal1ConeCut comes from the fact that the majority of the residual background is sneaking through the bottom of the TKR. The direction of these events is poorly reconstructed since, especially at high energy, the longest straightest track will often come from back-splash. On the other hand, the CAL axis will point along the direction of the incident particle causing the ACD to query the proper tiles.

...