Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • brief history, description of the project and the objectives
  • link to main SLAC page and also NUST
  • list of names, contact details (email, etc), their affiliation, and they scope of job in the project
  • a link to the data collected from UNIMAS and also other hosts in UM, USM, and UTM when they have their monitoring host running
  • link to meeting minutes in Confluence
  • Bebo added as an advisor
  • details of the workshop in UNIMAS and also slides from the talks and hands on sessions

It would help to have an MoU between SLAC and the UTM. Les has sent a request to his legal folks to ask how to proceed and whether he can share the UNIMAS MoU with UTM and UM.  He hopes to hear back in the coming 10 days. We will also need agreement to share from UNIMASUTM. Based on DOE current MOU policy, using the UNIMAS MOU format will not work. Our legal folks also think that merely adding additional parties to the current MOU will work either. The new DOE policy will require a new approval. We may be able to get DOE approval of a Work for Others agreement. To do a WFO agreement we would need, at a minimum:

  • A detailed project description describing the activities each party will perform
  • A description of the deliverables SLAC will provide
  • A schedule with completion dates for the activities
  • The key personnel and contact information for both parties
  • The term for performance of the project activities
  • An explanation of the unique capabilities SLAC will provide to the project not available elsewhere
  • An explanation how the project is compatible with existing SLAC program(s)
  • An explanation how the project enhances the mission of SLAC

Assuming we can get these issues addressed, our legal folks think we could seek DOE approval and enter into an agreement with these other universities.

Workshops

Johari is putting together a web site for the workshop at UNIMAS.

...