Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Overlay energy for tagged cluster

...

  • Johan algorithm works fine!
  • Clusters with at least one ghost-tagged xtal tend to have large overlay energy.
  • It never happen that overlay energy is 0 and there is some ghost-tagged xtal. The 'purity' of such selection is ~1.
    • Efficiency is low. We can't tag a good fraction of ghost clusters in this way.
  • There are few events with low overlay energy and low ghost-tagged energy. After looking at event displays I think we can consider good cluster is the ghost-tagged energy is <~3%
    • My suggestion for ghost tagging ghost clusters in is "TagGhostNumXtals>0 && (TagGhostRawEnergySum/CalawEnergySum)> 0.03"
  • We can include this algorithm just after clustering, and then tag ghost clusters. Not sure how we should use this info:
    • Select best cluster only if non ghost-tagged - what happen if the best cluster is also a ghost (i.e. there are no other options?)?
    • Use this info in tracking ( e.g. knowing that the direction is likely to be wrong). Need Tracy here...
    • Use in event-level analysis to select events with useless cal information (and treat them as tracker only if possible)
Ghost number and cluster classification

...