Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Initial betas: 50 cm


List of Datasets

ELOGURLCommentsResponsible for analysis 

Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05516


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05517


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05518

Alex,

analysis done. Results here

Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05519


Image Modified

 /nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05520


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05521
Forgot Probeline1 before

Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05522


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05523


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05524


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240218/E320_05525


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05527

Laser ON.

Waist at FILS


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05528

Repetition Laser ON

Waist at FILS

Nevertheless no matches (sad)

Might be a CMOS issue


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05529

Laser OFF

Waist at FILS


Image Added

 All LBG_LFOV Data looks like this, because the camera somehow interpreted the ROI of the profilemonitor wrong


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05530

Calibration with main beam and ND2 Inserted 

Waist at FILS


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05532
Laser ON with waist at PIC_CENT

Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05533
Laser ON with waist at PIC_CENT

Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05535

Timing scan

beta = 50 cm

waist at pic_cent


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05538

Timing scan

beta = 25 cm

waist at pic_cent


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05539

Timing scan

beta = 10 cm

waist at pic_cent


Image Modified

/nas/nas-li20-pm00/E320/2024/20240219/E320_05540

Timing scan

beta = 5 cm

waist at pic_cent














Post-beam characterization:

...

Bunch length (rms): 200 um

longitudinal data  is a bit misleading, bunch length was measured at 3 PM (see  http://physics-elog.slac.stanford.edu/facetelog/show.jsp?dir=/2024/08/19.02&pos=2024-02-20T23:50:00)

beta = 50cm:
Sigma X38.137.734.039.137.237.037.133.334.237.8
Sigma Y87.986.284.877.397.092.685.881.590.684.8

beta = 25cm:
Sigma X31.729.732.628.632.335.332.028.331.533.4
Sigma Y71.581.279.179.475.174.479.672.877.584.9

beta = 15cm:
Sigma X21.227.023.623.825.924.422.622.720.524.7
Sigma Y56.762.270.458.452.061.557.966.975.866.6

beta = 5cm:
Sigma X26.028.626.328.528.429.327.626.023.828.6
Sigma Y59.237.352.758.278.353.536.475.053.962.6



Focal scan

  • We have a very non-ideal laser focus (see elog)


    peak intensity during the z-scan looked okish

    outside the focal plane the spot becomes messy


    after optimizing with the beam shaper


...