Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Webex Connection Details - Briefing Meeting Oct.9-2013

Webex Connection Details - Ecal Review Oct.17, 2013

Review Charge

List of Questions from M.Garcon

List of Questions from J.Jaros

List of Questions with Answers (Summary Table)

Agenda

Time (Pacific)

Title & Speaker

Duration

Post your talk here

7:00 am

Project Organization & Overview, R. Dupré (IPNO)

10'

Overview.pdf

7:10 am

Motherboards, M. Battaglieri (INFN)

15'

Slides Pratolongo _mb.pdfMB

7:25 am

Pre-amplifiers, E. Rauly (IPNO)

15'

HPS_17oct2013_rauly_v3.pdf

7:40 am

Light Monitoring System, A. Celentano (INFN)

20'

Celentano-LedMonitor.pdf

8:00 am

Mechanics and Thermal System, P.Rosier (IPNO)

20'

mechanics_integration.pdf

8:20 am

New APDs installation, M. Battaglieri (INFN)

30' battaglieri_apd-oct13.pdf

APD replacement Battaglieri

8:50 am

Commissioning, Calibration and Interfaces F. X. Girod (JLab)

15'

girod_HPS_ecal_review.pdf

9:05

Schedule, Budget & Conclusions, R. Dupré (IPNO)

20' 

SBC-HPS.pdf

 

 

 

 

9:30 am

Closed Session (Review Panel only)

60' 

Final Report 10/29/2013

Material for the Review

Pre-amps calibration (E.Rauly)

Thermal Enclosure (P.Rosier)

Link to the CLAS12 Forward Tagger TDR http://www.ge.infn.it/~batta/jlab/ft-tdr.2.0.pdf. You will find results of LY measurement with BCTP PbWO-II crystals coupled to PMT and a 10x10 APD at pg 27.

Light Yeld estimate for a ECal crystal (old BTCP PbWO) from the HPS proposal  pag. 157, top-left panel . These are the measurements we performed in Genova, with a HPS-like crystal (from CLAS-IC),  a LA-APD, and a FT-Cal amplifier. The mean energy deposited in the crystal by cosmics is ~ 15 MeV. The corresponding mean charge collected is ~ 25 pC.The amplifier and APD gain were, respectively, 1800 and 150.  Measure was performed at 18 +++ 1 deg. This gives an average LY of : 25 / (1800 * 150 * 1.6E-7 *15) ~ 35 phe / MeV

"PbWO4 light output" email thread

O.Pogorelko's presentation where he takes 12 p.e./MeV and multiplies by 3 for "our crystals" and comes up with with "3.6 p.e./MeV at APD".  If we assume that 3.6 does not include QA=0.75 of APD, than real p.e./MeV will be 2.7. To many inconsistency. I think we should rely on what we (Andrea) measured.

HPS Proposal May'13

DOE Review July 11, 2011
 

Review Panel 

 

 

 

Marco Oriunno

SLAC

Chair

John Jaros

SLAC

Co-Chair

Stepan Stepanian

JLAB

Co-Chair

Raphael Dupre

IPNO Orsay

Link person to the ECAL project

Michel Garcon

CEA-Saclay

External Reviewer

Elton Smith

JLAB

External Reviewer