...
| Code Block |
|---|
veto TkrSideSeal: (CalDeltaEdgeEnergy < .75 || (CalDeltaEdgeEnergy < .95 - (30./(CalEdgeEnergy+20))^2 & CalEdgeEnergy < 300)) && CalDeltaEdgeEnergy < (1.1 - CalEdgeEnergy/200) |
CTBCPFGamProb>0
| Code Block |
|---|
filter nTkrFront: TkrNumTracks > 1 && Tkr1FirstLayer < 5 && (CTBTkrCoreCalDoca<40.56 || (CalXtalRatio<0.105 & EvtECalTransRms<3.45)) |
...
I took the recon files and created the CalEdgeEnergy variable for the first cluster to see if there was any impact on the selection. Unfortunately the recon files for v20r3p4 were somehow corrupt therefore in order to try this out I needed to use the recon files for the v19r4p1gr14 series. Below are the distributions for the Pass7 and Pass8. The statistics are limited (there are only 100 recon files available) thus it is hard to say anything however it looks like there is no substantial difference. I applied the same precuts as described above except the CTBCPFGamProb>0 because it removed too many background events and I wanted to see the overall effect of using the first cluster was.
