Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

Please edit this page to include results, issues, advice, etc., or links to these.

...

(30 March 2005) Here is an example of GRB analysis using Likelihood and XSPEC Jim Chiang

(19 April 2005) The 20% discrepancy found between Xspec and Likelihood fits in the above report is resolved in this comparison of Xspec and Likelihood results for burst-like transients with known properties Jim Chiang

(8 April 2005) David Band David Band (4/8/05, noon EDT): I worked my way through what will probably be a standard LAT GRB analysis. Thus I extracted the data from the GSSC website, ran gtselect for further selections (e.g., choosing the back of the LAT), ran gtbin to bin the spectra into a PHA file, ran gtrspgen to create a DRM, and then ran XSPEC. Because we need to provide users with 'analysis threads' which walk them through an analysis, I created a thread based on this GRB analysis; see http://glast.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/dev/Threads/Image Removed.

I ran into a number of small problems and bugs, which I reported on JIRA. A few general impressions:

...

Since I am working on defining and simulating the GBM data, I also tried the tools on the simulated GBM I posted. Actually, only gtbin and XSPEC are relevant since I created the DRM (=RSP file) with the simulation package. I was able to analyze successfully a background-less burst, but had trouble with a burst with background (I think this is a result of an incorrect exposure--I haven't tracked this down yet).

(18 Apr 2005) Tutorial and comments on GRB tools Francesco Longo